Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Health Econ. 2012 Nov;21(11):1367-74. doi: 10.1002/hec.1789. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
Previous analyses of fat taxes have generally worked within an empirical framework in which it is difficult to determine whether consumers benefit from the policy. This note outlines on simple means to determine whether consumers benefit from a fat tax by comparing the ratio of expenditures on the taxed good to the weight effect of the tax against the individual's willingness to pay for a one-pound weight reduction. Our empirical calculations suggest that an individual would have to be willing to pay about $1500 to reduce weight by one pound for a tax on sugary beverages to be welfare enhancing. The results suggest either that a soda tax is very unlikely to increase individual consumer welfare or that the policy must be justified on some other grounds that abandon standard rationality assumptions.
先前对脂肪税的分析通常在实证框架内进行,在这个框架中,很难确定消费者是否从该政策中受益。本说明概述了一种简单的方法,通过比较征税商品的支出与税收对体重的影响之比与个人对每磅体重减轻 1 磅的支付意愿,来确定消费者是否从脂肪税中受益。我们的实证计算表明,对于含糖饮料税,个人必须愿意支付约 1500 美元才能减轻 1 磅体重,才能提高福利。结果表明,苏打税不太可能增加个人消费者的福利,或者该政策必须基于其他理由来证明,这些理由放弃了标准理性假设。