Suppr超能文献

马来西亚和澳大利亚言语病理学家针对前语言阶段发育障碍儿童的实践比较。

A comparison of Malaysian and Australian speech-language pathologists' practices with children with developmental disabilities who are pre-symbolic.

作者信息

Joginder Singh Susheel, Iacono Teresa, Gray Kylie M

机构信息

Centre for Developmental Disability Health Victoria, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Oct;13(5):389-98. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2011.603429.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the assessment, intervention, and family-centred practices of Malaysian and Australian speech-language pathologists (SLPs) when working with children with developmental disabilities who are pre-symbolic. A questionnaire was developed for the study, which was completed by 65 SLPs from Malaysia and 157 SLPs from Australia. Data reduction techniques were used prior to comparison of responses across questionnaire items. Results indicated that SLPs relied mostly on informal assessments. Malaysian and Australian SLPs differed significantly in terms of obtaining information from outside the clinic to inform assessment. When providing intervention, SLPs focused mostly on improving children's pre-verbal skills. A third of Australian SLPs listed the introduction of some form of symbolic communication as an early intervention goal, compared to only a small percentage of Malaysian SLPs. Regarding family involvement, SLPs most often involved mothers, with fathers and siblings being involved to a lesser extent. Overall, it appeared that practices of Malaysian SLPs had been influenced by developments in research, although there were some areas of service delivery that continued to rely on traditional models. Factors leading to similarities and differences in practice of SLPs from both countries as well as clinical and research implications of the study are discussed.

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨马来西亚和澳大利亚的言语语言病理学家(SLP)在与处于前符号阶段的发育障碍儿童合作时的评估、干预及以家庭为中心的实践情况。为此研究设计了一份问卷,来自马来西亚的65名SLP和来自澳大利亚的157名SLP完成了该问卷。在对问卷项目的回答进行比较之前,使用了数据简化技术。结果表明,SLP大多依赖非正式评估。马来西亚和澳大利亚的SLP在从诊所外部获取信息以指导评估方面存在显著差异。在提供干预时,SLP主要关注提高儿童的前语言技能。三分之一的澳大利亚SLP将引入某种形式的符号交流列为早期干预目标,相比之下,只有一小部分马来西亚SLP这样做。关于家庭参与,SLP最常让母亲参与,父亲和兄弟姐妹的参与程度较低。总体而言,马来西亚SLP的实践似乎受到了研究进展的影响,尽管在一些服务提供领域仍依赖传统模式。讨论了导致两国SLP实践异同的因素以及该研究的临床和研究意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验