Washington University School of Medicine, USA.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Nov;31(7):1209-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
A meta-analysis of twin, family and adoption studies was conducted to estimate the magnitude of genetic and environmental influences on impulsivity. The best fitting model for 41 key studies (58 independent samples from 14 month old infants to adults; N=27,147) included equal proportions of variance due to genetic (0.50) and non-shared environmental (0.50) influences, with genetic effects being both additive (0.38) and non-additive (0.12). Shared environmental effects were unimportant in explaining individual differences in impulsivity. Age, sex, and study design (twin vs. adoption) were all significant moderators of the magnitude of genetic and environmental influences on impulsivity. The relative contribution of genetic effects (broad sense heritability) and unique environmental effects were also found to be important throughout development from childhood to adulthood. Total genetic effects were found to be important for all ages, but appeared to be strongest in children. Analyses also demonstrated that genetic effects appeared to be stronger in males than in females. Method of assessment (laboratory tasks vs. questionnaires), however, was not a significant moderator of the genetic and environmental influences on impulsivity. These results provide a structured synthesis of existing behavior genetic studies on impulsivity by providing a clearer understanding of the relative genetic and environmental contributions in impulsive traits through various stages of development.
采用双生子、家庭和领养研究的荟萃分析来估计冲动性的遗传和环境影响的大小。对 41 项关键研究(14 个月大的婴儿到成人的 58 个独立样本;N=27147)的最佳拟合模型包括遗传(0.50)和非共享环境(0.50)影响的方差相等,遗传效应既有累加(0.38)又有非累加(0.12)。共享环境效应在解释冲动性个体差异方面不重要。年龄、性别和研究设计(双胞胎与领养)都是影响冲动性遗传和环境影响大小的重要调节因素。在从儿童到成年的整个发展过程中,遗传效应(广义遗传率)和独特环境效应的相对贡献也被发现是重要的。总遗传效应对所有年龄段都很重要,但在儿童中似乎最强。分析还表明,遗传效应在男性中似乎比在女性中更强。然而,评估方法(实验室任务与问卷)并不是冲动性遗传和环境影响的重要调节因素。这些结果通过提供对冲动特质的相对遗传和环境贡献的更清晰理解,为现有的冲动行为遗传学研究提供了一个结构化的综合,贯穿了各个发展阶段。