• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国血管外科学会更新的颅外颈动脉疾病管理指南:执行摘要。

Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease: executive summary.

机构信息

Washington Hospital Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20010, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):832-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.004
PMID:21889705
Abstract

In 2008, the Society for Vascular Surgery published guidelines for the treatment of carotid bifurcation stenosis. Since that time, a number of prospective randomized trials have been completed and have shed additional light on the best treatment of extracranial carotid disease. This has prompted the Society for Vascular Surgery to form a committee to update and expand guidelines in this area. The review was done using the GRADE methodology.[corrected] The perioperative risk of stroke and death in asymptomatic patients must be below 3% to ensure benefit for the patient. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) should be reserved for symptomatic patients with stenosis 50% to 99% at high risk for CEA for anatomic or medical reasons. CAS is not recommended for asymptomatic patients at this time. Asymptomatic patients at high risk for intervention or with <3 years life expectancy should be considered for medical management as first line therapy. In this Executive Summary, we only outline the specifics of the recommendations made in the six areas evaluated. The full text of these guidelines can be found on the on-line version of the Journal of Vascular Surgery at http://journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ymva.

摘要

2008 年,血管外科学会发布了治疗颈动脉分叉狭窄的指南。自那时以来,已经完成了许多前瞻性随机试验,进一步阐明了治疗颅外颈动脉疾病的最佳方法。这促使血管外科学会成立一个委员会来更新和扩展该领域的指南。审查使用 GRADE 方法进行。[纠正]无症状患者围手术期中风和死亡的风险必须低于 3%,以确保对患者有益。颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)应保留给有症状的患者,这些患者因解剖或医学原因,狭窄 50%至 99%,CEA 风险高。目前不建议对无症状患者进行 CAS。对于有介入治疗高风险或预期寿命<3 年的无症状患者,应考虑作为一线治疗的药物治疗。在本执行摘要中,我们仅概述了在评估的六个领域中提出的建议的具体内容。这些指南的全文可在血管外科学会杂志的在线版本上找到,网址为 http://journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ymva。

相似文献

1
Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease: executive summary.美国血管外科学会更新的颅外颈动脉疾病管理指南:执行摘要。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):832-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.004.
2
Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease.美国血管外科学会更新的颅外颈动脉疾病管理指南。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):e1-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.031.
3
The European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for carotid intervention: an updated independent assessment and literature review.欧洲血管外科学会颈动脉介入治疗指南:最新独立评估和文献回顾。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;44(3):238-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.015. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
4
Comparison of the five 2011 guidelines for the treatment of carotid stenosis.比较 2011 年的五项颈动脉狭窄治疗指南。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 May;55(5):1504-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.084.
5
Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry.颈动脉支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术的风险调整后30天结局:来自血管外科学会(SVS)血管登记处的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.039. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
6
Carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting? Matching the patient to the intervention.颈动脉内膜切除术还是颈动脉支架置入术?使患者与干预措施相匹配。
Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2010 Jun;22(2):124-36. doi: 10.1177/1531003510381136.
7
No benefit from carotid intervention in fatal stroke prevention for >80-year-old patients.对于 >80 岁的患者,颈动脉干预并不能预防致命性中风。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;44(3):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
8
Management of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery.动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉疾病的管理:血管外科学会临床实践指南
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Aug;48(2):480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.05.036.
9
An evolution in thinking from modern carotid registries: CAS and CEA will be complimentary and not competitive techniques.现代颈动脉登记研究带来的思维转变:颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)和颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)将成为互补而非相互竞争的技术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar 1;75(4):526-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22482.
10
Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries.来自 2 个前瞻性、多中心、高手术风险登记处的 6320 例患者的颈动脉支架置入术 30 天结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(3):159-66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Endarterectomy and Stenting in the Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Real-World Nationwide, Total Population-Based Study from Korea.颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较:一项来自韩国的基于全国总人口的真实世界研究。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025;31(1). doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.24-00177.
2
CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing a Neurointerventional Procedure.CYP2C19基因分型指导的抗血小板治疗与接受神经介入手术患者的临床结局
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan;18(1):e70131. doi: 10.1111/cts.70131.
3
Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes Following Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting.
使用机器学习预测经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术后的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 3;13(17):e035425. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035425. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
4
Improved cognition and preserved hippocampal fractional anisotropy in subjects undergoing carotid endarterectomy "CEA preserves cognition & hippocampal structure".颈动脉内膜切除术“CEA 保留认知和海马结构”可改善认知并保持海马各向异性分数。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2024 Nov;33(11):107926. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107926. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
5
Predicting Major Adverse Carotid Cerebrovascular Events in Patients with Carotid Stenosis: Integrating a Panel of Plasma Protein Biomarkers and Clinical Features-A Pilot Study.预测颈动脉狭窄患者的主要不良颈动脉脑血管事件:整合一组血浆蛋白生物标志物和临床特征——一项试点研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 9;13(12):3382. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123382.
6
Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians compared to their younger counterparts: a retrospective observational study.八旬老人与较年轻者相比行颈动脉内膜切除术的结果:一项回顾性观察研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 May;106(5):248-254. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.5.248. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
7
Transcarotid arterial revascularization is feasible and safe with concomitant inferior vena cava occlusion.经颈动脉血管重建术在伴有下腔静脉闭塞的情况下是可行且安全的。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2024 Jan 14;10(3):101414. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101414. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Mobile Atheroma in the Left Internal Carotid Artery: A Case of Impending Doom!左颈内动脉活动粥样斑块:一例危在旦夕的病例!
Cureus. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):e51181. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51181. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Impact of Vascular Service Centralization on the Carotid Endarterectomy Pathway: A Study at the Bedfordshire, Luton, and Milton Keynes Vascular Network.血管服务集中化对颈动脉内膜切除术路径的影响:贝德福德郡、卢顿和米尔顿凯恩斯血管网络的一项研究
Cureus. 2023 Nov 30;15(11):e49726. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49726. eCollection 2023 Nov.
10
Current Biomarkers for Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.颈动脉狭窄的当前生物标志物:文献综述
Metabolites. 2023 Aug 5;13(8):919. doi: 10.3390/metabo13080919.