• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自 2 个前瞻性、多中心、高手术风险登记处的 6320 例患者的颈动脉支架置入术 30 天结果。

Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries.

机构信息

Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(3):159-66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013
PMID:20031712
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association has established guidelines for acceptable 30-day death and stroke rates for patients with severe carotid disease undergoing standard-risk carotid endarterectomy: <3% for asymptomatic lesions and <6% for symptomatic lesions. To date, carotid artery stenting has not demonstrated these outcomes in multicenter, prospective assessments of high-surgical-risk patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 2 prospective, multicenter (280 US sites, 672 operators), postmarket surveillance studies in high-surgical-risk patients were analyzed: 2145 patients from the Emboshield and Xact Post Approval Carotid Stent Trial (EX) and 4175 patients from the Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover Rare Events (C2). Both studies had pre- and postprocedure neurological evaluation and independent adjudication of neurological events. The overall 30-day death and stroke rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 3.3% to 5.0%) for EX and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.9% to 4.0%) for C2. In the population comparable with American Heart Association guidelines (<80 years), the combined 30-day death and stroke rate was 5.3% (95% CI, 3.6% to 7.4%) for symptomatic patients and 2.9% (95% CI, 2.4% to 3.4%) for asymptomatic patients, independent of unfavorable risk factors (anatomic or physiologic); in patients >/=80 years, this rate was 10.5% (95% CI, 6.3% to 16.0%) and 4.4% (95% CI, 3.3% to 5.7%), respectively. In subjects with anatomic features unfavorable for surgery, the 30-day death and stroke rates were 1.7% (95% CI, 0.0% to 8.9%) and 2.7% (95% CI, 1.3% to 4.9%) for symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts, respectively, independent of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes for carotid artery stenting in nonoctogenarian high-surgical-risk patients have improved since the pivotal Food and Drug Administration approval trials, and have achieved American Heart Association standards in both symptomatic and asymptomatic lesions.

摘要

背景

美国心脏协会为接受标准风险颈动脉内膜切除术的严重颈动脉疾病患者制定了可接受的 30 天死亡和卒中发生率指南:无症状病变<3%,有症状病变<6%。迄今为止,多中心前瞻性评估高手术风险患者的颈动脉支架置入术并未显示出这些结果。

方法和结果

对高手术风险患者的 2 项前瞻性、多中心(280 个美国站点,672 名操作者)上市后监测研究的数据进行了分析:来自 Emboshield 和 Xact 术后批准颈动脉支架置入试验(EX)的 2145 例患者和来自颈动脉 ACCULINK/ACCUNET 术后批准试验以揭示罕见事件(C2)的 4175 例患者。两项研究均进行了术前和术后神经评估以及独立的神经事件裁决。EX 的总体 30 天死亡和卒中发生率为 4.1%(95%CI,3.3%至 5.0%),C2 为 3.4%(95%CI,2.9%至 4.0%)。在与美国心脏协会指南(<80 岁)可比的人群中,症状性患者的联合 30 天死亡和卒中发生率为 5.3%(95%CI,3.6%至 7.4%),无症状患者为 2.9%(95%CI,2.4%至 3.4%),独立于不利的危险因素(解剖或生理);>/=80 岁的患者,这一比率分别为 10.5%(95%CI,6.3%至 16.0%)和 4.4%(95%CI,3.3%至 5.7%)。在解剖特征不利于手术的患者中,症状性和无症状队列的 30 天死亡和卒中发生率分别为 1.7%(95%CI,0.0%至 8.9%)和 2.7%(95%CI,1.3%至 4.9%),独立于年龄。

结论

非 80 岁以上高手术风险患者的颈动脉支架置入术的结果自关键的食品和药物管理局批准试验以来有所改善,并且在有症状和无症状病变中均达到了美国心脏协会的标准。

相似文献

1
Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries.来自 2 个前瞻性、多中心、高手术风险登记处的 6320 例患者的颈动脉支架置入术 30 天结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(3):159-66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.823013. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
2
The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting.CAPTURE注册研究:早期批准后使用栓子保护装置对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的预后预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Dec 1;70(7):1025-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21359.
3
CAPTURE 2 risk-adjusted stroke outcome benchmarks for carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection.使用远端栓塞保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术的 CAPTURE 2 风险调整后的卒中结果基准。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):576-83, 583.e1-583.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.064. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
4
Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: the BEACH trial 30 day results.高手术风险患者行远端保护下的颈动脉支架置入术:BEACH试验30天结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):503-12. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20689.
5
Carotid artery revascularization in high surgical risk patients with the NexStent and the Filterwire EX/EZ: 1-year results in the CABERNET trial.使用NexStent和Filterwire EX/EZ对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉血管重建术:CABERNET试验的1年结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun 1;71(7):950-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21564.
6
Safety and efficacy of carotid stenting in the very elderly.高龄患者颈动脉支架置入术的安全性和有效性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr 1;75(5):651-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22345.
7
Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry.颈动脉支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术的风险调整后30天结局:来自血管外科学会(SVS)血管登记处的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.039. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
8
Treatment of asymptomatic carotid disease with stenting: pro.无症状性颈动脉疾病的支架置入治疗:赞成方。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;21(2):95-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2008.03.005.
9
Carotid artery stenting in surgical high-risk patients.外科手术高危患者的颈动脉支架置入术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):513-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20640.
10
The cart and the horse: the advancing technology of carotid artery stenting.推车与马匹:颈动脉支架置入术的技术进展
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(3):153-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.874578.

引用本文的文献

1
Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy.经颈动脉血运重建监测项目七年,与经股动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1455-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization: A systematic review.经颈动脉血运重建术的结果:一项系统性综述。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;30(3):396-403. doi: 10.1177/15910199221123283. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
3
"Real-World Study of a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent in Elective Treatment of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis (ROADSAVER)".
“双层微网支架在有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄择期治疗中的真实世界研究(ROADSAVER)”。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Mar;45(3):277-282. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-03051-5. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.颈动脉内膜切除术与无症状颈动脉狭窄患者初始药物治疗的疗效比较。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):1110-1121. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1427.
5
Carotid arterial stent implantation follow-up and results in 50 patients: preliminary report.50例患者颈动脉支架植入术的随访及结果:初步报告
Electron Physician. 2018 Feb 25;10(2):6400-6405. doi: 10.19082/6400. eCollection 2018 Feb.
6
Evidence-Based Carotid Interventions for Stroke Prevention: State-of-the-art Review.基于证据的颈动脉干预预防卒中:最新综述
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017 Apr 3;24(4):373-387. doi: 10.5551/jat.38745. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
7
The urgent need for contemporary clinical trials in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者对当代临床试验的迫切需求。
Neurology. 2016 Nov 22;87(21):2271-2278. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003267. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
Optimal treatment of extracranial carotid artery disease: carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenting, or optimal medical therapy.颅外颈动脉疾病的最佳治疗方法:颈动脉内膜切除术、颈动脉支架置入术或最佳药物治疗。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Oct;17(10):84. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0636-2.
9
Carotid artery stenting and patient outcomes: the CABANA surveillance study.颈动脉支架置入术与患者预后:CABANA监测研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):997-1004. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25578. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
10
State of the art in carotid artery stenting: trial data, technical aspects, and limitations.颈动脉支架置入术的最新进展:试验数据、技术要点及局限性
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014 Jun;7(4):446-57. doi: 10.1007/s12265-014-9567-3. Epub 2014 Apr 26.