Suppr超能文献

导致急诊科急性主动脉夹层漏诊的因素。

Factors leading to failure to diagnose acute aortic dissection in the emergency room.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiol. 2011 Nov;58(3):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is often missed on initial assessment.

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to identify features associated with misdiagnosis of AAD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined a total of 109 emergency room (ER) patients who were ultimately diagnosed with AAD. Misdiagnosis of AAD was defined as failure to diagnose AAD at the end of the initial assessment in the ER, and occurred in 17 patients (16%). The alternate diagnosis consisted of acute coronary syndrome (n=10), other cardiovascular disease (n=3), abdominal disease (n=3), and cerebral infarction (n=1). In the misdiagnosed patients, walk-in mode of admission to the ER (29% vs. 10%, p=0.042) and anterior chest pain (71% vs. 41%, p=0.025) were more frequent, and widened mediastinum (25% vs. 55%, p=0.023) was less frequent than in diagnosed patients. The number of imaging studies performed per patient was also fewer in misdiagnosed patients than in diagnosed patients (0.82 ± 0.81 vs. 1.53 ± 0.52, p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (18% vs. 15%, p=0.520). Multivariate analysis showed that the strongest predictor of misdiagnosis was walk-in mode of admission (odds ratio 4.777; 95% confidence interval 1.267-18.007; p=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Both diversity of symptoms and variability of the severity of symptoms, especially walk-in mode of admission lead ER physicians to miss AAD in about 1 in 6 cases of AAD. It is therefore important to keep AAD as a differential diagnosis in mind, even when patients present with mild enough symptoms that allow them to walk into the ER.

摘要

背景

急性主动脉夹层(AAD)在初次评估时经常被漏诊。

目的

本研究旨在确定与 AAD 误诊相关的特征。

方法和结果

我们共检查了 109 名最终被诊断为 AAD 的急诊室(ER)患者。AAD 的误诊定义为在 ER 的初始评估结束时未能诊断出 AAD,并发生在 17 名患者(16%)中。替代诊断包括急性冠状动脉综合征(n=10)、其他心血管疾病(n=3)、腹部疾病(n=3)和脑梗死(n=1)。在误诊患者中,急诊室就诊的走急诊模式(29% vs. 10%,p=0.042)和前胸痛(71% vs. 41%,p=0.025)更为常见,而纵隔增宽(25% vs. 55%,p=0.023)则较诊断患者更为少见。误诊患者的每位患者接受的影像学检查次数也少于诊断患者(0.82±0.81 vs. 1.53±0.52,p<0.001)。然而,住院死亡率无显著差异(18% vs. 15%,p=0.520)。多变量分析显示,误诊的最强预测因素是急诊就诊模式(优势比 4.777;95%置信区间 1.267-18.007;p=0.021)。

结论

症状的多样性和严重程度的可变性,尤其是走急诊模式,导致 ER 医生在约 1/6 的 AAD 病例中漏诊 AAD。因此,即使患者的症状足够轻微,允许他们走入急诊室,也应牢记 AAD 作为鉴别诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验