• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较尼古丁对人 ECV304/大鼠 C6 共培养物和人 CaCo₂细胞的跨细胞电阻和蔗糖通透性的影响。

Comparison of the effects of nicotine upon the transcellular electrical resistance and sucrose permeability of human ECV304/rat C6 co-cultures and human CaCo₂ cells.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Toxicol Lett. 2011 Nov 10;207(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.08.014
PMID:21889975
Abstract

It is now well established that nicotine adversely affects the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). In contrast, nicotine has been reported to increase the transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) of CaCo₂ colon cancer cells. In the present study, the effects of nicotine upon the TEER and sucrose permeability of ECV304/C6 co-cultures and, for comparative purposes, CaCo₂ cells has been investigated. Neither ECV304 nor C6 cells were found to express measurable membrane levels of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, as assessed by [³H]-epibatidine binding. Nicotine treatment (0.01-1 μM) for up to 48 h had little or no effect upon the TEER or sucrose permeability of either ECV304/C6 co-cultures or CaCo₂ cells. It is concluded that in contrast to the situation for the BBB, ECV304 cells lack nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and the barrier properties of ECV304/C6 co-cultures are not affected to any important extent by nicotine. This study underlines the conclusions made by other authors that the ECV304/C6 co-culture system is of limited validity as a model of the BBB.

摘要

现在已经证实,尼古丁会对血脑屏障(BBB)的完整性产生不利影响。相比之下,有报道称尼古丁会增加 CaCo₂ 结肠癌细胞的跨内皮电阻(TEER)。在本研究中,研究了尼古丁对 ECV304/C6 共培养物的 TEER 和蔗糖通透性的影响,并为了进行比较,还研究了 CaCo₂ 细胞。通过 [³H]-epibatidine 结合评估,发现无论是 ECV304 还是 C6 细胞都没有表达可测量的烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体膜水平。尼古丁处理(0.01-1 μM)长达 48 小时,对 ECV304/C6 共培养物或 CaCo₂ 细胞的 TEER 或蔗糖通透性几乎没有影响。因此可以得出结论,与 BBB 的情况相反,ECV304 细胞缺乏烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体,ECV304/C6 共培养物的屏障特性不会受到尼古丁的重要影响。这项研究强调了其他作者的结论,即 ECV304/C6 共培养系统作为 BBB 模型的有效性有限。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the effects of nicotine upon the transcellular electrical resistance and sucrose permeability of human ECV304/rat C6 co-cultures and human CaCo₂ cells.比较尼古丁对人 ECV304/大鼠 C6 共培养物和人 CaCo₂细胞的跨细胞电阻和蔗糖通透性的影响。
Toxicol Lett. 2011 Nov 10;207(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.08.014. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
2
Induction of blood-brain barrier properties in cultured brain capillary endothelial cells: comparison between primary glial cells and C6 cell line.培养的脑微血管内皮细胞血脑屏障特性的诱导:原代神经胶质细胞与C6细胞系的比较。
Glia. 2005 Aug 15;51(3):187-98. doi: 10.1002/glia.20189.
3
Effect of nicotine and polyaromtic hydrocarbons on cerebral endothelial cells.
Cell Biol Int. 2008 Feb;32(2):198-209. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2007.08.026. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
4
Evaluation of bEnd5 cell line as an in vitro model for the blood-brain barrier under normal and hypoxic/aglycemic conditions.评估bEnd5细胞系作为正常及缺氧/无糖条件下血脑屏障的体外模型。
J Pharm Sci. 2007 Dec;96(12):3196-213. doi: 10.1002/jps.21002.
5
An ECV304 monoculture model for permeability assessment of blood-brain barrier.一种用于评估血脑屏障通透性的ECV304单培养模型。
Neurol Res. 2018 Feb;40(2):117-121. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2017.1398882. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
6
Identification of two immortalized cell lines, ECV304 and bEnd3, for in vitro permeability studies of blood-brain barrier.鉴定两种永生化细胞系ECV304和bEnd3,用于血脑屏障的体外通透性研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 23;12(10):e0187017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187017. eCollection 2017.
7
Activation of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor upregulates blood-brain barrier function through increased claudin-5 and occludin expression in rat brain endothelial cells.α7烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体的激活通过增加大鼠脑内皮细胞中闭合蛋白-5和闭合蛋白的表达来上调血脑屏障功能。
Neurosci Lett. 2019 Feb 16;694:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.11.022. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
Involvement of DMT1 +IRE in the transport of lead in an in vitro BBB model.DMT1+IRE 在内皮细胞血脑屏障模型中转运铅的作用
Toxicol In Vitro. 2011 Jun;25(4):991-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.11.006. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
9
Regulation of the blood-brain barrier integrity by pericytes via matrix metalloproteinases mediated activation of vascular endothelial growth factor in vitro.体外周细胞通过基质金属蛋白酶介导的血管内皮生长因子激活调节血脑屏障完整性。
Brain Res. 2010 Aug 6;1347:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.096. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
10
Closing the gap between the in-vivo and in-vitro blood-brain barrier tightness.缩小体内和体外血脑屏障紧密性之间的差距。
Brain Res. 2009 Aug 11;1284:12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.072. Epub 2009 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Erythrocytes, a New Contributor to Age-Associated Loss of Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity.红细胞:与年龄相关的血脑屏障完整性丧失的新贡献者。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021 Oct;8(20):e2101912. doi: 10.1002/advs.202101912. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
2
Substance Use Disorder in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Vulnerabilities and Complications.2019冠状病毒病大流行中的物质使用障碍:对脆弱性和并发症的系统评价
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Jul 18;13(7):155. doi: 10.3390/ph13070155.
3
Effects of Drugs of Abuse on the Blood-Brain Barrier: A Brief Overview.
滥用药物对血脑屏障的影响:简要概述
Front Neurosci. 2020 May 21;14:513. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00513. eCollection 2020.
4
Quantitative prediction of human pharmacokinetic responses to drugs via fluidically coupled vascularized organ chips.通过液流连接的血管化器官芯片定量预测药物的人体药代动力学反应。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2020 Apr;4(4):421-436. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0498-9. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
5
Inflammation Modulates RLIP76/RALBP1 Electrophile-Glutathione Conjugate Transporter and Housekeeping Genes in Human Blood-Brain Barrier Endothelial Cells.炎症调节人血脑屏障内皮细胞中的RLIP76/RALBP1亲电物-谷胱甘肽共轭转运体和管家基因。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 25;10(9):e0139101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139101. eCollection 2015.
6
The effects of psychostimulant drugs on blood brain barrier function and neuroinflammation.精神兴奋药物对血脑屏障功能和神经炎症的影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2012 Jun 29;3:121. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00121. eCollection 2012.