Department of General Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8706, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2011 Sep;75(9):1249-55.
We tested whether a computerized dental simulator (CDS) pre-test could predict preclinical operative dentistry examination scores. Thirty-eight first-year students completed cavity preparations during a single four-hour CDS pre-test prior to the operative dentistry course and during subsequent practical examinations. Masked, calibrated faculty members scored the preparations in both settings. Pass rates for the CDS pre-test, Exam 1, and Exam 2 were 50 percent, 66 percent, and 86 percent, respectively. Students who passed the CDS pre-test were more likely to pass Exam 1 (95 percent vs. 37 percent, p=0.0004) but not Exam 2 (89 percent vs. 83 percent, p=0.66) and had better mean scores on Exam 1 (73.4 vs. 68.3, p<0.0001), but not Exam 2 (76.2 vs. 74.7, p=0.35). As a diagnostic, success on the CDS pre-test predicted success on Exam 1 with 72 percent sensitivity and 92 percent specificity (positive predictive value 95 percent, negative predictive value 63 percent). As a diagnostic for Exam 2 performance, the CDS pre-test was a weaker predictor and not statistically significant. These findings suggest that a pre-course CDS test may help to identify students in need of early instructional intervention. Future studies are warranted to further define and implement the use of simulation technology in the assessment of students' psychomotor learning potential.
我们测试了一个计算机化牙科模拟器(CDS)预测试是否可以预测临床前口腔操作考试成绩。38 名一年级学生在口腔操作课程之前的单次四小时 CDS 预测试期间和随后的实践考试期间完成了窝洞制备。经过掩蔽和校准的教师在这两种情况下对准备情况进行评分。CDS 预测试、考试 1 和考试 2 的通过率分别为 50%、66%和 86%。通过 CDS 预测试的学生更有可能通过考试 1(95%对 37%,p=0.0004),但不能通过考试 2(89%对 83%,p=0.66),并且在考试 1 上的平均分数更高(73.4 对 68.3,p<0.0001),但不是考试 2(76.2 对 74.7,p=0.35)。作为一种诊断方法,CDS 预测试在考试 1 上的成功具有 72%的敏感性和 92%的特异性(阳性预测值 95%,阴性预测值 63%)。作为考试 2 成绩的诊断,CDS 预测试是一个较弱的预测因素,且不具有统计学意义。这些发现表明,课程前的 CDS 测试可以帮助识别需要早期教学干预的学生。未来的研究需要进一步定义和实施模拟技术在评估学生心理运动学习能力方面的应用。