• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机临床试验评估 39 周时宫颈条件不佳行胎膜剥膜术的频率。

Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Naval Medical Center - Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA;

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:287-94. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S23436. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S23436
PMID:21892340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3163659/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the widely accepted use of membrane sweeping to prevent postmaturity pregnancies, the optimal frequency for this procedure has not been established.

AIM

To determine if the frequency of membrane sweeping in women with an unfavorable cervix at term results in fewer labor inductions.

METHODS

This was a randomized trial of women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop's score of ≤4) at 39 weeks randomized into three groups: control, once-weekly membrane sweeping, and twice-weekly membrane sweeping.

RESULTS

Between January 2005 and June 2008, 350 women were randomized into the study (groups: control [n = 116], once weekly [n = 117], and twice weekly [n = 117]). Randomization of Bishop's score was different between groups (P = 0.019), with 67%, 71%, and 83% of control, once-, and twice-weekly groups, respectively, having scores of 3-4. There was no difference in the unadjusted rate of labor induction between the groups (35% versus 27% versus 23%, P = 0.149), and after the adjustment for the randomization of Bishop's score (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-1.29 and OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.36-1.18 for once- and twice-weekly groups, respectively). A Bishop's score of 3-4 at randomization was the only statistically significant factor that decreased the likelihood of induction at 41 weeks (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.69).

CONCLUSION

Frequency of membrane sweeping does not influence the likelihood of remaining undelivered at 41 weeks of pregnancy. The Bishop's score at around 39 weeks is the important factor as a predictor of the duration of pregnancy, and further studies would be required to determine whether membrane sweeping influences pregnancy duration.

摘要

背景

尽管膜扫术被广泛用于预防过期妊娠,但该操作的最佳频率尚未确定。

目的

确定足月时宫颈条件不佳(Bishop 评分≤4)的女性进行膜扫术的频率是否会减少引产。

方法

这是一项随机试验,纳入 39 周时宫颈条件不佳(Bishop 评分≤4)的女性,分为三组:对照组、每周一次膜扫术组和每周两次膜扫术组。

结果

2005 年 1 月至 2008 年 6 月,共纳入 350 名女性(对照组:n=116;每周一次膜扫术组:n=117;每周两次膜扫术组:n=117)。Bishop 评分的随机分组存在差异(P=0.019),对照组、每周一次膜扫术组和每周两次膜扫术组的 3-4 分评分分别为 67%、71%和 83%。三组间未校正的引产率无差异(35%、27%和 23%,P=0.149),Bishop 评分的校正后比值比(OR)也无差异[分别为 0.73(95%置信区间:0.41-1.29)和 0.65(95%置信区间:0.36-1.18]。随机分组时 Bishop 评分为 3-4 分是唯一显著降低 41 周时引产可能性的因素(OR=0.42,95%置信区间:0.25-0.69)。

结论

膜扫术的频率并不影响妊娠 41 周时未分娩的可能性。Bishop 评分在 39 周左右是预测妊娠持续时间的重要因素,还需要进一步研究以确定膜扫术是否影响妊娠持续时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e7e/3163659/4107cb4962e8/ijwh-3-287f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e7e/3163659/72492658a097/ijwh-3-287f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e7e/3163659/4107cb4962e8/ijwh-3-287f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e7e/3163659/72492658a097/ijwh-3-287f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e7e/3163659/4107cb4962e8/ijwh-3-287f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks.随机临床试验评估 39 周时宫颈条件不佳行胎膜剥膜术的频率。
Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:287-94. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S23436. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
2
Twice-Weekly Versus Once-Weekly Membrane Sweeping in the Prevention of Post-Term Pregnancy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.两周一次与一周一次膜扫在预防过期妊娠中的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Sci. 2024 Jan;31(1):56-65. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01298-6. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
3
Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.引产术前宫颈主观与客观评估的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Aug;26(6):521-6. doi: 10.1080/01443610600797459.
4
Modified Bishop's score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery.既往有剖宫产史患者的改良Bishop评分与引产
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;191(5):1644-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.075.
5
Effect of Oral Mifepristone on Modified Bishop's Score in Term Pregnancy.口服米非司酮对足月妊娠改良Bishop评分的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2024 Jun;74(3):219-223. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01875-4. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
6
Effect of Saffron (Fan Hong Hua) On the Readiness of The Uterine Cervix In Term Pregnancy: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial.藏红花(番红花)对足月妊娠子宫颈成熟度的影响:一项安慰剂对照随机试验。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016 Jun 20;18(10):e27241. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.27241. eCollection 2016 Oct.
7
[The opening of the internal cervical os predicts cervical ripening better than Bishop's score in nulliparous women at 41 weeks gestation].在妊娠41周的初产妇中,宫颈内口开放比Bishop评分更能预测宫颈成熟度。
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Nov 29;25:203. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.203.10188. eCollection 2016.
8
[Cervical ultrasonography versus Bishop score as a predictor of vaginal delivery].[经阴道超声与Bishop评分作为阴道分娩预测指标的比较]
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2011 Nov;33(11):361-6. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032011001100007.
9
Vaginal Misoprostol vs Vaginal Misoprostol With Estradiol for Labor Induction: A Prospective Double Blind Study.阴道米索前列醇与阴道米索前列醇联合雌二醇用于引产:一项前瞻性双盲研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Feb;62(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0156-6. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
10
Comparison of Dinoprostone and Oxytocin for the Induction of Labor in Late-Term Pregnancy and the Rate of Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Study in Ten Centers in South China.比较地诺前列酮与缩宫素在晚期妊娠引产中的应用及剖宫产率:华南地区十家中心的回顾性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Nov 13;25:8554-8561. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918330.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing membrane sweep and cervical massage in preventing the need for formal labour induction in uncomplicated pregnancy at term: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.足月正常妊娠中比较膜剥离术和宫颈按摩术预防正式引产需求的随机对照试验二次分析
PLoS One. 2025 May 20;20(5):e0324172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324172. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of Single Fetal Membrane Sweeping in Reducing Elective Labor Induction for Postdate Pregnancies (38+0 to 40+6 Weeks): A Randomized Controlled Trial.单胎膜剥脱术在减少过期妊娠(38+0至40+6周)选择性引产中的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58030. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58030. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetricians-gynecologists. Number 55, September 2004 (replaces practice pattern number 6, October 1997). Management of Postterm Pregnancy.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告。妇产科临床管理指南。第55号,2004年9月(取代1997年10月的实践模式第6号)。过期妊娠的管理。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;104(3):639-46. doi: 10.1097/00006250-200409000-00052.
2
The role of membrane stripping in prevention of post-term pregnancy: a randomised clinical trial in Ile-lfe, Nigeria.膜剥脱术在预防过期妊娠中的作用:尼日利亚伊莱-伊费的一项随机临床试验
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 May;22(3):283-6. doi: 10.1080/01443610220130571.
3
Twice-Weekly Versus Once-Weekly Membrane Sweeping in the Prevention of Post-Term Pregnancy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
两周一次与一周一次膜扫在预防过期妊娠中的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Sci. 2024 Jan;31(1):56-65. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01298-6. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
4
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.人工破膜引产
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub3.
Does sweeping of membranes beyond 40 weeks reduce the need for formal induction of labour?
超过40周进行胎膜剥离是否会减少正式引产的必要性?
BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):632-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01193.x.
4
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.人工破膜引产
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.
5
Stripping/sweeping the membranes for inducing labour or preventing post-term pregnancy.人工破膜/剥膜引产或预防过期妊娠。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.
6
Outcomes of post-term births: the role of fetal growth restriction and malformations.过期产的结局:胎儿生长受限和畸形的作用。
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Nov;94(5 Pt 1):758-62. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00387-7.
7
A comparative study of membrane stripping and nonstripping for induction of labor in uncomplicated term pregnancy.未足月单胎妊娠引产中胎膜早破与未破的比较研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 1999 Mar;82(3):229-33.
8
Can we decrease postdatism in women with an unfavorable cervix and a negative fetal fibronectin test result at term by serial membrane sweeping?对于足月时宫颈条件不佳且胎儿纤连蛋白检测结果为阴性的女性,通过连续进行胎膜剥离术,我们能否降低过期妊娠的发生率?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Oct;179(4):890-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70184-x.
9
Management of pregnancies beyond forty-one weeks' gestation with an unfavorable cervix.宫颈条件不佳的孕41周以上妊娠的管理。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;178(6):1279-87. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70334-5.
10
Fetal and neonatal mortality in the postterm pregnancy: the impact of gestational age and fetal growth restriction.过期妊娠中的胎儿及新生儿死亡率:孕周和胎儿生长受限的影响
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Apr;178(4):726-31. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70482-x.