• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过系统重新设计减轻临床医生的认知工作量:一项出声思考法的前后对比可用性研究。

Reducing clinicians' cognitive workload by system redesign; a pre-post think aloud usability study.

作者信息

Peute L W P, De Keizer N F, Van Der Zwan E P A, Jaspers M W M

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:925-9.

PMID:21893881
Abstract

Interactive Health Information systems are often considered cognitively complex by their users, leading to high cognitive burden and increased workload. This paper explores if Think Aloud usability testing provides valuable input to effectively redesign a web-based Data Query Tool in Intensive Care and to reduce physicians' cognitive workload during system interaction. Pre and post redesign usability testing demonstrated a major reduction in the cognitive task workload after redesign of the tool. Classification of revealed usability problems by means of the User Action Framework pointed out that usability problems related to the cognitively planning of actions by system users foremost affected cognitive task workload. This result may support Health Information system (re)design efforts on how to tackle the system's cognitive complexity and in so doing improve on its usability.

摘要

交互式健康信息系统通常被其用户认为在认知上很复杂,从而导致高认知负担和工作量增加。本文探讨出声思维可用性测试是否能提供有价值的输入,以有效地重新设计重症监护中的基于网络的数据查询工具,并减少医生在系统交互过程中的认知工作量。重新设计前后的可用性测试表明,该工具重新设计后认知任务工作量大幅减少。通过用户行动框架对所发现的可用性问题进行分类指出,与系统用户行动的认知规划相关的可用性问题对认知任务工作量影响最大。这一结果可能有助于健康信息系统(重新)设计工作,以解决系统的认知复杂性问题,从而提高其可用性。

相似文献

1
Reducing clinicians' cognitive workload by system redesign; a pre-post think aloud usability study.通过系统重新设计减轻临床医生的认知工作量:一项出声思考法的前后对比可用性研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:925-9.
2
Cognitive evaluation of a physician data query tool for a national ICU registry: comparing two think aloud variants and their application in redesign.针对国家重症监护病房登记处的医生数据查询工具的认知评估:比较两种出声思考变体及其在重新设计中的应用。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 1):309-13.
3
Integrating usability testing and think-aloud protocol analysis with "near-live" clinical simulations in evaluating clinical decision support.将可用性测试和出声思维协议分析与“近乎实时”的临床模拟相结合,评估临床决策支持。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Nov;81(11):761-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
4
Optimizing the user interface of a data entry module for an electronic patient record for cardiac rehabilitation: A mixed method usability approach.优化心脏康复电子病历数据录入模块的用户界面:一种混合方法可用性研究
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Mar;87:15-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
5
National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability.全国临床信息学技术系统调查问卷研究证明:医生深受可用性差之苦。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Oct;80(10):708-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
6
Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.用于评估临床信息系统的认知与可用性工程方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2004 Feb;37(1):56-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.01.003.
7
Clinical guideline representation in a CDS: a human information processing method.临床指南在临床决策支持系统中的呈现:一种人类信息处理方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;180:427-31.
8
The significance of a usability evaluation of an emerging laboratory order entry system.新兴实验室医嘱录入系统可用性评估的意义
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Feb-Mar;76(2-3):157-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
9
The value of Retrospective and Concurrent Think Aloud in formative usability testing of a physician data query tool.回顾性与并发出声思维法在医生数据查询工具形成性可用性测试中的价值
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Jun;55:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
10
A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence.用于测试交互式健康技术的可用性方法比较:方法学方面与实证证据
Int J Med Inform. 2009 May;78(5):340-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Data Entry Interface Design on Cognitive Workload, Documentation Correctness, and Documentation Efficiency.数据录入界面设计对认知工作量、文档正确性和文档效率的影响。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2021 May 17;2021:634-643. eCollection 2021.
2
The relationship between user interface problems of an admission, discharge and transfer module and usability features: a usability testing method.入院、出院和转科模块用户界面问题与可用性特征之间的关系:一种可用性测试方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 24;19(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0893-x.
3
Association of Data Integration Technologies With Intensive Care Clinician Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
数据集成技术与重症监护临床医生绩效的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194392. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4392.
4
"Usability of data integration and visualization software for multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care: a human factors approach to assessing technology".数据集成和可视化软件在多学科儿科重症监护中的可用性:一种评估技术的人为因素方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Aug 14;17(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0520-7.
5
Why aren't they happy? An analysis of end-user satisfaction with Electronic health records.他们为什么不开心?对电子健康记录终端用户满意度的分析。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:2026-2035. eCollection 2016.