• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用和不使用远端栓子保护装置对无症状和有症状的颈动脉狭窄进行颈动脉支架置入术。

Carotid stenting of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenoses with and without the use of a distal embolic protection device.

作者信息

Wu Yi-Ming, Wong Ho-Fai, Chen Yao-Liang, Wong Mun-Ching, Toh Cheng-Hong

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol. 2011 Aug;66(4):453-8. doi: 10.1080/ac.66.4.2126593.

DOI:10.1080/ac.66.4.2126593
PMID:21894801
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of symptomatic and clinically silent embolic following carotid angioplasty and stent placement (CAS) with and without the use of an embolic protection device (EPD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2006 and April 2009, 76 patients with carotid stenosis underwent 79 CAS procedures (three patients had bilateral CAS). In this group, 44 of the 79 procedures were performed with an EPD, and 35 were performed without an EPD. In the EPD group, 26 treated hemispheres received pre- and post-operative diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), and in the non-EPD group, 16 treated hemispheres received pre- and post-operative DWI.

RESULTS

All 79 procedures were technically successful without significant residual stenosis. In the EPD group, there were three symptomatic ischaemic events (6.8%), and 4 of the 26 (15.4%) treated hemispheres which received MRI showed new DWI lesions. In the non-EPD group, there was one symptomatic ischaemic event (2.9%), one mortality (2.9%) due to reperfusion injury with intracranial haemorrhage, and three of the 16 (18.8%) treated hemispheres which received MRI showed new DWL lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this retrospective analysis do not show demonstrable benefits of reducing new DWI lesions or major/minor ischaemic events after CAS with a filter protection device. Further investigations with more accurate risk-analysis strategies remain necessary in hopes of selecting patients most likely to benefit from the use of an embolic protection device.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估在使用和不使用栓子保护装置(EPD)的情况下,颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)后有症状和临床无症状栓塞的发生率。

材料与方法

2006年1月至2009年4月,76例颈动脉狭窄患者接受了79例CAS手术(3例患者接受双侧CAS)。在该组中,79例手术中有44例使用了EPD,35例未使用EPD。在EPD组中,26个治疗半球接受了术前和术后弥散加权磁共振成像(DWI),在非EPD组中,16个治疗半球接受了术前和术后DWI。

结果

所有79例手术在技术上均获成功,无明显残余狭窄。在EPD组中,有3例有症状缺血事件(6.8%),接受MRI检查的26个治疗半球中有4个(15.4%)显示出新的DWI病变。在非EPD组中,有1例有症状缺血事件(2.9%),1例因颅内出血再灌注损伤死亡(2.9%),接受MRI检查的16个治疗半球中有3个(18.8%)显示出新的DWL病变。

结论

这项回顾性分析的结果未显示使用滤器保护装置的CAS术后在减少新的DWI病变或主要/次要缺血事件方面有明显益处。仍需要采用更准确的风险分析策略进行进一步研究,以期筛选出最可能从使用栓子保护装置中获益的患者。

相似文献

1
Carotid stenting of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenoses with and without the use of a distal embolic protection device.使用和不使用远端栓子保护装置对无症状和有症状的颈动脉狭窄进行颈动脉支架置入术。
Acta Cardiol. 2011 Aug;66(4):453-8. doi: 10.1080/ac.66.4.2126593.
2
Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: is there a difference between filter and distal occlusive devices?用于颈动脉支架置入术的栓子保护装置:滤网式装置和远端闭塞式装置之间有区别吗?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 7;45(11):1769-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.067.
3
Carotid artery stenting according to the tailored-CAS algorithm is associated with a low complication rate at 30 days: data from the TARGET-CAS study.根据定制化颈动脉支架术(CAS)算法行颈动脉支架置入术与 30 天内低并发症发生率相关:TARGET-CAS 研究的数据。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(4):378-86.
4
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.采用改良系统的颈动脉支架置入术治疗伴有远端栓塞保护装置的结果:高危颈动脉内膜切除术患者颈动脉支架置入术保护(PROTECT)试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):968-976.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
5
Cerebral ischemic lesions detected with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid artery stenting: Comparison of several anti-embolic protection devices.颈动脉支架置入术后通过磁共振扩散加权成像检测到的脑缺血性病变:几种抗栓保护装置的比较
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2009 Sep;49(9):386-93. doi: 10.2176/nmc.49.386.
6
Combination of flow reversal and distal filter for cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中用于脑保护的血流逆转与远端滤器联合应用。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;28(3):651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.04.032. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
7
Double Filtration During Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Novel Post-Dilation Balloon With Integrated Embolic Protection.双重过滤颈动脉支架置入术:一种新型后置扩张球囊联合内置栓塞保护装置
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.039.
8
Comparison of self-expanding stents with distal embolic protection to balloon-expandable stents without a protection device in the treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery origin stenosis: a prospective randomized trial.自膨式带远端栓子保护装置支架与无保护装置的球囊扩张式支架治疗有症状的椎动脉起始部狭窄的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):436-44. doi: 10.1177/1526602815579406. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
9
Unprotected carotid artery stenting in modern practice.现代实践中的无保护颈动脉支架置入术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar 1;83(4):595-602. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25090. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
10
A diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-based study of transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal versus transfemoral filter protection.基于扩散加权磁共振成像的经颈内颈动脉支架置入术与经股动脉滤器保护的血流逆转研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Dec;56(6):1585-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.107. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive values of carotid high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for large embolus shedding in carotid artery stenting.颈动脉高分辨率磁共振成像预测颈动脉支架置入术中大栓子脱落的价值。
Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Apr;52(2):286-293. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5314. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
2
Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.颈动脉血运重建术后扩散加权成像上的无症状脑梗死:程序性卒中的替代结局指标?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Jun;4(2):127-143. doi: 10.1177/2396987318824491. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
3
Carotid artery stenting in a single center, single operator, single type of device and 15 years of follow-up.
在单一中心、由单一操作者使用单一类型设备进行颈动脉支架置入术并随访15年。
CVIR Endovasc. 2018;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s42155-018-0008-2. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
Protected versus Unprotected Carotid Artery Stenting : Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature.颈动脉支架置入术:有保护装置与无保护装置的比较——当前文献的荟萃分析
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018 Jul;61(4):458-466. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0202.001. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
5
Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉疾病支架置入术后选择性扩张与标准扩张的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 May;38(5):999-1005. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5103. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
6
Lesion-Related Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting with Closed-Cell Design without Embolic Protection Devices in High-Risk Elderly Patients-Can This Concept Work Out? A Single Center Experience Focusing on Stent Design.高危老年患者中不使用栓子保护装置的闭孔设计相关颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术——这个概念可行吗?以支架设计为重点的单中心经验
Int J Angiol. 2014 Dec;23(4):263-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390084.
7
Risk factors for developing large emboli following carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后形成大栓子的危险因素。
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013 Mar;53(3):155-60. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2013.53.3.155. Epub 2013 Mar 31.