Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche, Università Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 1 I-00133 Rome, Italy.
J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Oct 19;133(41):16625-34. doi: 10.1021/ja206890y. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
A time-resolved kinetic study on the hydrogen abstraction reactions from a series of primary and secondary amines by the cumyloxyl (CumO(•)) and benzyloxyl (BnO(•)) radicals was carried out. The results were compared with those obtained previously for the corresponding reactions with tertiary amines. Very different hydrogen abstraction rate constants (k(H)) and intermolecular selectivities were observed for the reactions of the two radicals. With CumO(•), k(H) was observed to decrease on going from the tertiary to the secondary and primary amines. The lowest k(H) values were measured for the reactions with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TMP) and tert-octylamine (TOA), substrates that can only undergo N-H abstraction. The opposite behavior was observed for the reactions of BnO(•), where the k(H) values increased in the order tertiary < secondary < primary. The k(H) values for the reactions of BnO(•) were in all cases significantly higher than those measured for the corresponding reactions of CumO(•), and no significant difference in reactivity was observed between structurally related substrates that could undergo exclusive α-C-H and N-H abstraction. This different behavior is evidenced by the k(H)(BnO(•))/k(H)(CumO(•)) ratios that range from 55-85 and 267-673 for secondary and primary alkylamines up to 1182 and 3388 for TMP and TOA. The reactions of CumO(•) were described in all cases as direct hydrogen atom abstractions. With BnO(•) the results were interpreted in terms of the rate-determining formation of a hydrogen-bonded prereaction complex between the radical α-C-H and the amine lone pair wherein hydrogen abstraction occurs. Steric effects and amine HBA ability play a major role, whereas the strength of the substrate α-C-H and N-H bonds involved appears to be relatively unimportant. The implications of these different mechanistic pictures are discussed.
研究了一系列伯胺和仲胺与枯基过氧基(CumO(•))和苄基过氧基(BnO(•))自由基的氢提取反应的时间分辨动力学。将结果与以前用叔胺获得的相应反应的结果进行了比较。两种自由基的反应观察到非常不同的氢提取速率常数(k(H))和分子间选择性。对于 CumO(•),k(H)观察到从叔胺到仲胺和伯胺降低。与 2,2,6,6-四甲基哌啶(TMP)和叔辛胺(TOA)的反应的 k(H)值最低,这些底物只能发生 N-H 提取。对于 BnO(•)的反应观察到相反的行为,其中 k(H)值按叔胺<仲胺<伯胺的顺序增加。在所有情况下,BnO(•)的反应的 k(H)值都明显高于相应的 CumO(•)反应的 k(H)值,并且可以进行专性α-C-H 和 N-H 提取的结构相关底物之间的反应性没有明显差异。这种不同的行为由 k(H)(BnO(•))/k(H)(CumO(•)) 比来证明,对于仲和伯烷基胺,其范围从 55-85 和 267-673 到 TMP 和 TOA,其范围从 1182 和 3388。在所有情况下,CumO(•)的反应都被描述为直接氢原子提取。对于 BnO(•),结果根据自由基α-C-H 和胺孤对之间形成氢键的预反应络合物的速率决定解释,其中发生氢提取。空间效应和胺 HBA 能力起主要作用,而涉及的底物α-C-H 和 N-H 键的强度似乎相对不重要。讨论了这些不同的机制图的含义。