Suppr超能文献

多杀菌素和米尔贝肟单独及联合经口给药于犬的药代动力学。

Pharmacokinetics of spinosad and milbemycin oxime administered in combination and separately per os to dogs.

作者信息

Holmstrom S D, Totten M L, Newhall K B, Qiao M, Riggs K L

机构信息

Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.

出版信息

J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Aug;35(4):351-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2011.01333.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were conducted to determine the potential PK interactions when spinosad and milbemycin oxime (MBO) are administered simultaneously. Investigations used commercial MBO tablets (C-MBO; Interceptor(®) Flavor Tabs, active ingredient MBO, Novartis Animal Health, Greensboro, NC, USA), novel-source (Elanco) MBO (E-MBO) in a gelatin capsule, spinosad API (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient using registered manufacturing process) in a gelatin capsule, spinosad tablets (Comfortis(®) chewable beef flavored tablets, active ingredient spinosad, Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN, USA), and the recently registered spinosad + E-MBO combination tablets (Trifexis™ chewable beef flavored tablets, active ingredients E-MBO and spinosad, Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN, USA). Regardless of the source of MBO, in the presence of spinosad, greater systemic exposure of MBO was obtained as compared to MBO administered alone. Target animal safety studies conducted with dose multiples of spinosad and MBO indicate the increased exposure of MBO does not have implications on adverse clinical reactions. Further research is required to determine whether the higher levels of MBO have any implications for improved effectiveness as compared to C-MBO. Effectiveness studies conducted with 0.5 mg/kg of E-MBO in combination tablets demonstrated noninterference against C-MBO with both products achieving >99% effectiveness against the dose-limiting nematode, Ancylostoma caninum. No statistical differences were detected in the PK of MBO when comparing animals receiving E-MBO (without spinosad) and C-MBO. Also, the PK of spinosad was unaltered when co-administered with MBO.

摘要

进行了药代动力学(PK)研究,以确定同时给予多杀菌素和米尔贝肟(MBO)时潜在的PK相互作用。研究使用了市售的MBO片剂(C-MBO;Interceptor(®) Flavor Tabs,活性成分MBO,美国北卡罗来纳州格林斯博罗的诺华动物保健公司)、明胶胶囊中的新型来源(英特威)MBO(E-MBO)、明胶胶囊中的多杀菌素原料药(采用注册生产工艺的活性药物成分)、多杀菌素片剂(Comfortis(®) 牛肉味咀嚼片,活性成分多杀菌素,美国印第安纳州格林菲尔德的英特威动物保健公司),以及最近注册的多杀菌素 + E-MBO复方片剂(Trifexis™ 牛肉味咀嚼片,活性成分E-MBO和多杀菌素,美国印第安纳州格林菲尔德的英特威动物保健公司)。无论MBO的来源如何,与单独给予MBO相比,在多杀菌素存在的情况下,MBO的全身暴露量更高。用多杀菌素和MBO的剂量倍数进行的靶动物安全性研究表明,MBO暴露量的增加对不良临床反应没有影响。需要进一步研究以确定与C-MBO相比,较高水平的MBO是否对提高有效性有任何影响。在复方片剂中使用0.5 mg/kg的E-MBO进行的有效性研究表明,两种产品对剂量限制性线虫犬钩口线虫的有效性均>99%,且相互之间无干扰。在比较接受E-MBO(无多杀菌素)和C-MBO的动物时,未检测到MBO的PK有统计学差异。此外,多杀菌素与MBO共同给药时,其PK未发生改变。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验