Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Equine Vet J. 2012 Jul;44(4):416-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00470.x. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
Surgical correction of carpal angular limb deformities by growth retardation is commonly undertaken with a screws and tension band wire loop technique (S&W) or a single transphyseal screw (STS). This study compares complications after S&W and STS bridging in the distal radius of Thoroughbred yearlings.
To compare the prevalence of complications serious enough to require follow-up radiographs following either S&W or STS surgery for growth manipulation in the distal radius of Thoroughbred yearlings.
Medical records and radiographs from Thoroughbred yearlings (age range 261-457 days) treated for carpal angular limb deformities at a single hospital over 2 years were reviewed. Each of the techniques was used exclusively during a single year. The complication threshold criterion for inclusion was the need for nonroutine radiographs of the operated site anytime after implant insertion or removal.
Of 568 horses, 253 received S&W and 315 received STS. Horses were of similar age at the time of surgery for STS and S&W. Single transphyseal screws were left in place for a significantly shorter amount of time (16 days). Sex, the limb(s) treated and medial vs. lateral placement were not significantly different between techniques. Complications included physitis post implant removal, metaphyseal collapse post implant removal, infection, overcorrection and seroma formation severe enough to require radiography. Physitis and metaphyseal collapse occurred significantly more frequently with STS compared with S&W. Infection, overcorrection and seromas were not significantly different between techniques.
The STS and S&W techniques are both viable treatment options for correction of carpal angular limb deformities. However, horses treated with the STS technique have a significantly increased risk of developing physitis or metaphyseal collapse.
Horses treated with STS bridging have a significantly increased risk of developing the post correction complications of moderate to severe physitis and metaphyseal collapse compared with horses treated with S&W bridging.
通过生长抑制进行腕关节角状肢体畸形的手术矫正通常采用螺钉和张力带钢丝环技术(S&W)或单根经骺螺钉(STS)。本研究比较了纯种一岁马桡骨远端采用S&W和STS桥接术后的并发症情况。
比较在纯种一岁马桡骨远端进行生长控制时,采用S&W或STS手术治疗后,严重到需要进行后续X光检查的并发症发生率。
回顾了一家医院在两年内治疗腕关节角状肢体畸形的纯种一岁马(年龄范围261 - 457天)的病历和X光片。每种技术仅在一年中单独使用。纳入的并发症阈值标准是在植入物插入或取出后的任何时间需要对手术部位进行非常规X光检查。
在568匹马中,253匹接受了S&W治疗,315匹接受了STS治疗。接受STS和S&W治疗的马在手术时年龄相似。单根经骺螺钉留置的时间明显更短(16天)。技术之间在性别、治疗的肢体以及内侧与外侧放置方面没有显著差异。并发症包括植入物取出后骨骺炎、植入物取出后干骺端塌陷、感染、过度矫正和严重到需要进行X光检查的血清肿形成。与S&W相比,STS术后骨骺炎和干骺端塌陷的发生率明显更高。技术之间在感染、过度矫正和血清肿方面没有显著差异。
STS和S&W技术都是矫正腕关节角状肢体畸形的可行治疗选择。然而,接受STS技术治疗的马发生骨骺炎或干骺端塌陷的风险显著增加。
与接受S&W桥接治疗的马相比,接受STS桥接治疗的马发生中度至重度骨骺炎和干骺端塌陷等矫正后并发症的风险显著增加。