Suppr超能文献

准确计算近视性倾斜盘眼 OCT 测量视网膜神经纤维层厚度的测量圈位置。

Correct calculation circle location of optical coherence tomography in measuring retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in eyes with myopic tilted discs.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Oct 7;52(11):7894-900. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7712.

Abstract

PURPOSE. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) can be unreliable in the presence of a myopic tilted disc. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the calculation circle location of spectral domain (SD)-OCT when measuring RNFL thickness in healthy subjects with myopic tilted disc. METHODS. Sixty-nine eyes with myopic tilted disc and no other ocular abnormalities were analyzed. In all eyes, RNFL thickness was measured twice: first, along a calculation circle determined by a built-in algorithm (referred to as circle 1) and then along a manually positioned calculation circle based on the contours of the neural canal opening (NCO) (referred to as circle 2). The mean number of clock hours below normal at the 5% level and the proportion of eyes with abnormally thin clock hours at the 5% level were compared between the two methods: RESULTS. The mean number of clock hours below normal at the 5% level was significantly lower in circle 2 (0.84 ± 1.31) than in circle 1 (1.42 ± 1.43; P < 0.05). The proportion of eyes with abnormally thin clock hours at the 5% level was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in circle 2 (42%) than in circle 1 (69.9%). CONCLUSIONS. In subjects with myopic tilted disc, RNFL thickness measurements along the calculation circle based on the contours of the NCO seem to be more comparable to the normative database of the SD-OCT than does the automatically determined scan position.

摘要

目的。光学相干断层扫描(OCT)测量的视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度在存在近视性倾斜盘时可能不可靠。本研究的目的是研究在存在近视性倾斜盘的健康受试者中,使用谱域(SD)-OCT 测量 RNFL 厚度时计算圆位置的影响。

方法。分析了 69 只存在近视性倾斜盘且无其他眼部异常的眼睛。在所有眼睛中,两次测量 RNFL 厚度:首先,沿着内置算法确定的计算圆(称为圆 1),然后沿着基于神经管开口(NCO)轮廓手动定位的计算圆(称为圆 2)。比较两种方法在 5%水平下正常时钟小时数的平均值和异常薄时钟小时数的眼数比例:

结果。圆 2(0.84 ± 1.31)的正常时钟小时数平均值明显低于圆 1(1.42 ± 1.43;P < 0.05)。在 5%水平下异常薄时钟小时数的眼比例在圆 2 中明显较低(P < 0.001)(42%),而在圆 1 中明显较高(69.9%)。

结论。在存在近视性倾斜盘的受试者中,沿 NCO 轮廓的计算圆进行的 RNFL 厚度测量似乎比 SD-OCT 的自动确定扫描位置更能与正常数据库相比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验