• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从 SYNTAX 试验中吸取的多支血管和左主干冠状动脉疾病的经验教训。

Lessons learned from the SYNTAX trial for multivessel and left main stem coronary artery disease.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Surgery, Oxford University, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011 Nov;26(6):502-7. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32834ba1e6.

DOI:10.1097/HCO.0b013e32834ba1e6
PMID:21897216
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) trial is the most important trial of surgery and stents in patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) and reflects real clinical practice. This review describes its key findings at 3 years with particular reference to what is already known on this topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Taking together the SYNTAX randomized trial and its registry component, almost 79% of patients with three-vessel CAD and almost two-thirds of patients with left main stem (LMS) disease have a survival benefit and marked reduction in the need for repeat revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in comparison to stents, implying that CABG is still the treatment of choice for most of these patients. This conclusion, at odds with results of previous trials of stenting and surgery but consistent with findings of large propensity-matched registries, can be explained by the fact that SYNTAX enrolled 'real life' patients rather than the highly select patients in previous trials. SYNTAX also shows that for patients with less severe CAD there is no difference in survival between CABG and stents but a lower incidence of repeat revascularization with CABG.

SUMMARY

The results of the SYNTAX trial confirm that at 3 years CABG remains the treatment of choice for most patients with three-vessel and LMS disease and especially in those with the most severe disease. SYNTAX will have a profound effect on practice recommendations for the foreseeable future and already has had a major effect on the new European Society for Cardiology/European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery guidelines for myocardial revascularization.

摘要

目的综述

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与紫杉醇和心脏手术(SYNTAX)试验是最重要的手术和支架治疗严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的试验,反映了真实的临床实践。这篇综述描述了其 3 年的关键发现,并特别提到了该主题的已有知识。

最近的发现

综合 SYNTAX 随机试验及其注册部分,近 79%的三血管 CAD 患者和约三分之二的左主干(LMS)疾病患者与支架相比,具有生存获益和明显减少再次血运重建的需求冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG),这意味着 CABG 仍然是这些患者的治疗选择。这一结论与以前支架和手术试验的结果不一致,但与大型倾向匹配注册研究的结果一致,可以用以下事实来解释:SYNTAX 招募了“真实生活”的患者,而不是以前试验中高度选择的患者。SYNTAX 还表明,对于 CAD 程度较轻的患者,CABG 和支架治疗在生存率方面没有差异,但 CABG 的再次血运重建发生率较低。

总结

SYNTAX 试验的结果证实,3 年后 CABG 仍然是大多数三血管和 LMS 疾病患者的首选治疗方法,尤其是那些疾病最严重的患者。SYNTAX 将对可预见的未来的实践建议产生深远影响,并且已经对新的欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南产生了重大影响。

相似文献

1
Lessons learned from the SYNTAX trial for multivessel and left main stem coronary artery disease.从 SYNTAX 试验中吸取的多支血管和左主干冠状动脉疾病的经验教训。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011 Nov;26(6):502-7. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32834ba1e6.
2
Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phase.当前针对三支血管病变及左主干冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术实践。来自SYNTAX导入期的见解。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Apr;29(4):486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.047. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
3
The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase.紫杉醇药物洗脱支架冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术协同作用(SYNTAX)研究:设计、原理及导入阶段
Am Heart J. 2006 Jun;151(6):1194-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.07.017.
4
Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.在 Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery(SYNTAX)试验中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗使用紫杉醇洗脱支架或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗新发左主干疾病患者的结局。
Circulation. 2010 Jun 22;121(24):2645-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.899211. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
5
Diabetic and nondiabetic patients with left main and/or 3-vessel coronary artery disease: comparison of outcomes with cardiac surgery and paclitaxel-eluting stents.左主干和/或 3 支血管病变的糖尿病和非糖尿病患者:心脏手术与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗结果的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 16;55(11):1067-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.057. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
6
Predictive accuracy of SYNTAX score for predicting long-term outcomes of unprotected left main coronary artery revascularization.SYNTAX 评分预测非保护左主干冠状动脉血运重建长期预后的准确性。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Feb 1;107(3):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.09.029.
7
[3-year results of the SYNTAX trial--stent or surgery? A surgeon's perspective].[SYNTAX 试验的 3 年结果——支架还是手术?外科医生的观点]
Clin Res Cardiol Suppl. 2011 May;6:43-8. doi: 10.1007/s11789-011-0023-5.
8
Impact of completeness of revascularization on the five-year outcome in percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft patients (from the ARTS-II study).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的血管重建完全程度对五年结果的影响(来自 ARTS-II 研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Nov 15;106(10):1369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.069. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
9
Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial.随机比较糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术。CARDia(糖尿病患者冠状动脉血运重建)试验的 1 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 2;55(5):432-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.014.
10
Stenting versus surgical bypass grafting for coronary artery disease: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials.冠状动脉疾病的支架植入术与外科搭桥术:随机试验的系统综述和荟萃分析
Ital Heart J. 2003 Apr;4(4):271-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularisation Surgery: A Focused Review of the Available Literature.微创冠状动脉血运重建手术:对现有文献的重点综述
Interv Cardiol. 2021 May 19;16:e08. doi: 10.15420/icr.2021.05. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in left main stem stenosis: outcomes, concerns and controversies.非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术治疗左主干狭窄:结果、关注点与争议
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Nov;8(Suppl 10):S787-S794. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.09.72.
3
Coronary artery surgery: now and in the next decade.冠状动脉手术:现状与未来十年展望。
HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2012;4(4):217-23.