• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大剂量静脉注射甲氧氯普胺与五药联合止吐方案的随机交叉比较

Randomized crossover comparison of high-dose intravenous metoclopramide versus a five-drug antiemetic regimen.

作者信息

Plezia P M, Alberts D S, Kessler J F, Berens P L, Chase J L, Roe D J

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 1990 Apr;5(2):101-8. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(05)80023-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0885-3924(05)80023-5
PMID:2189929
Abstract

In a randomized open crossover study, the antiemetic efficacy of a five-drug antiemetic regimen consisting of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, diazepam, diphenhydramine, and thiethylperazine was compared to that of high-dose metoclopramide. Thirteen patients treated with cisplatin combination chemotherapy regimens were evaluated. The study was terminated prior to accrual of the planned number of patients because of the statistically significant difference in efficacy between treatments found at interim analysis. The duration of nausea and number of vomiting episodes on the day of chemotherapy were significantly less (p less than 0.01) after receiving the five-drug combination. After receiving the five-drug regimen, 77% of the patients did not experience any episodes of vomiting on day 1, and 8% of patients had only one episode. In contrast, only 31% of patients treated with high-dose metoclopramide did not have any episodes of vomiting on day 1, and 61% of the patients had five or more episodes. None of the patients treated with the five-drug regimen required additional antiemetic administration. Although both regimens were, in general, well tolerated, when given the choice of continuing antiemetic therapies, 92% of the patients preferred the five-drug antiemetic combination.

摘要

在一项随机开放交叉研究中,将由胃复安、地塞米松、地西泮、苯海拉明和硫乙拉嗪组成的五药联合止吐方案的止吐效果与高剂量胃复安的止吐效果进行了比较。对13例接受顺铂联合化疗方案治疗的患者进行了评估。由于中期分析发现治疗之间的疗效存在统计学显著差异,该研究在纳入计划数量的患者之前就终止了。接受五药联合治疗后,化疗当天恶心的持续时间和呕吐发作次数显著减少(p<0.01)。接受五药方案后,77%的患者在第1天没有经历任何呕吐发作,8%的患者只有一次发作。相比之下,接受高剂量胃复安治疗的患者中,只有31%在第1天没有任何呕吐发作,61%的患者有5次或更多次发作。接受五药方案治疗的患者均无需额外给予止吐药。虽然两种方案总体上耐受性良好,但在选择继续使用止吐疗法时,92%的患者更喜欢五药联合止吐方案。

相似文献

1
Randomized crossover comparison of high-dose intravenous metoclopramide versus a five-drug antiemetic regimen.大剂量静脉注射甲氧氯普胺与五药联合止吐方案的随机交叉比较
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1990 Apr;5(2):101-8. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(05)80023-5.
2
Immediate termination of intractable vomiting induced by cisplatin combination chemotherapy using an intensive five-drug antiemetic regimen.
Cancer Treat Rep. 1984 Dec;68(12):1493-5.
3
The antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron plus dexamethasone as compared with conventional metoclopramide-dexamethasone combination in Orientals receiving cisplatin chemotherapy: a randomized crossover trial.在接受顺铂化疗的东方人群中,托烷司琼联合地塞米松与传统甲氧氯普胺联合地塞米松相比的止吐疗效:一项随机交叉试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 May;41(5):403-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.03268.x.
4
Ondansetron + dexamethasone vs metoclopramide + dexamethasone + diphenhydramine in prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Italian Group For Antiemetic Research.昂丹司琼+地塞米松与甲氧氯普胺+地塞米松+苯海拉明预防顺铂所致呕吐的比较。意大利抗呕吐研究组
Lancet. 1992 Jul 11;340(8811):96-9.
5
Ondansetron plus dexamethasone versus metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus diphenhydramine in cisplatin-treated patients with ovarian cancer. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research.昂丹司琼联合地塞米松与甲氧氯普胺联合地塞米松及苯海拉明用于顺铂治疗的卵巢癌患者。意大利止吐研究组。
Support Care Cancer. 1994 May;2(3):167-70.
6
Double-blind crossover trial of single vs. divided dose of metoclopramide in a combined regimen for treatment of cisplatin-induced emesis.甲氧氯普胺单剂量与分剂量联合方案治疗顺铂所致呕吐的双盲交叉试验
Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(2):119-21. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90466-q.
7
Efficacy & tolerability of ondansetron compared to metoclopramide in dose dependent cisplatin-induced delayed emesis.昂丹司琼与胃复安相比在顺铂诱导的剂量依赖性迟发性呕吐中的疗效和耐受性
Indian J Med Res. 2004 Sep;120(3):183-93.
8
Consecutive dose-finding trials adding lorazepam to the combination of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone: improved subjective effectiveness over the combination of diphenhydramine plus metoclopramide plus dexamethasone.连续剂量探索试验:在甲氧氯普胺加地塞米松的联合用药方案中添加劳拉西泮,与苯海拉明加甲氧氯普胺加地塞米松的联合用药方案相比,主观疗效得到改善。
Cancer Treat Rep. 1985 Nov;69(11):1257-62.
9
Difference in persistence of efficacy of two antiemetic regimens on acute emesis during cisplatin chemotherapy. The Italian Group for Antiemetic Research.两种止吐方案对顺铂化疗期间急性呕吐疗效持续性的差异。意大利止吐研究小组。
J Clin Oncol. 1993 Dec;11(12):2396-404. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.12.2396.
10
Antiemetic control and prevention of side effects of anti-cancer therapy with lorazepam or diphenhydramine when used in combination with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone. A double-blind, randomized trial.使用劳拉西泮或苯海拉明联合胃复安加地塞米松进行止吐控制及预防抗癌治疗副作用的双盲随机试验。
Cancer. 1987 Dec 1;60(11):2816-22. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19871201)60:11<2816::aid-cncr2820601137>3.0.co;2-7.

引用本文的文献

1
[Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].[化疗引起的呕吐的管理:经过20年临床研究后何为标准]
Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Jan;93 Suppl 1:3-17. doi: 10.1007/BF03041988.