Suppr超能文献

在接受顺铂化疗的东方人群中,托烷司琼联合地塞米松与传统甲氧氯普胺联合地塞米松相比的止吐疗效:一项随机交叉试验。

The antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron plus dexamethasone as compared with conventional metoclopramide-dexamethasone combination in Orientals receiving cisplatin chemotherapy: a randomized crossover trial.

作者信息

Chua D T, Sham J S, Au G K, Choy D, Kwong D L, Yau C C, Cheng A C

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 May;41(5):403-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.03268.x.

Abstract
  1. We report a single-blind randomized crossover trial comparing the efficacy of tropisetron plus dexamethasone (TROPDEX) vs conventional combination of metoclopramide, dexamethasone and diphenhydramine (METDEX) in prevention of acute and delayed vomiting in Chinese patients receiving high dose cisplatin. 2. Thirty-six consecutive patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were entered into the study, all received cisplatin at a dose range of 60-100 mg/m2. Patients were randomized in the sequence of antiemetic regimens used in two consecutive cycles. 3. The TROPDEX regimen consisting of tropisetron 5 mg i.v. and dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. given on day 1 of chemotherapy, followed by oral maintenance with tropisetron 5 mg daily and dexamethasone 4 mg twice daily from day 2 to 6. The METDEX regimen consisting of metoclopramide 1 mg kg-1 i.v., dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. and diphenhydramine 25 mg i.v. given before chemotherapy and then 2 hourly for two more doses on day 1, followed by oral metoclopramide 20 mg 6 hourly from day 2 to 6. 4. Complete control of acute vomiting was observed in 64% of patients with TROPDEX as compared with 14% with METDEX (P < 0.01). While complete plus major control of acute vomiting was observed in 84% with TROPDEX as compared with 58% with METDEX. The mean vomiting episodes on day 1 were 1.4 with TROPDEX as compared with 3.5 with METDEX (P < 0.01). There was, however, no significant difference between the two regimens in the control of delayed vomiting. 5. When patients randomized to TROPDEX in the second cycle were compared with those with TROPDEX in the first cycle, the antiemetic efficacy was reduced, with mean acute vomiting episodes of 2 in the former compared with 0.8 in the latter (P < 0.01). 6. The most common adverse effect observed was headache in TROPDEX (27%) and dizziness in METDEX (40%). 7. In conclusion, the antiemetic regimen TROPDEX is effective in Chinese patients receiving high dose cisplatin chemotherapy and is well tolerated. It is better than conventional METDEX regimen in the control of acute vomiting, but not in the control of delayed vomiting.
摘要
  1. 我们报告了一项单盲随机交叉试验,比较了托烷司琼加地塞米松(TROPDEX)与甲氧氯普胺、地塞米松和苯海拉明传统联合用药(METDEX)在预防接受高剂量顺铂治疗的中国患者急性和迟发性呕吐方面的疗效。2. 36例连续的鼻咽癌患者进入本研究,均接受剂量范围为60 - 100mg/m²的顺铂治疗。患者按照连续两个周期使用的止吐方案顺序进行随机分组。3. TROPDEX方案包括化疗第1天静脉注射托烷司琼5mg和地塞米松20mg,随后从第2天至第6天口服维持,托烷司琼每日5mg,地塞米松每日两次,每次4mg。METDEX方案包括化疗前静脉注射甲氧氯普胺1mg/kg、地塞米松20mg和苯海拉明25mg,然后在第1天每2小时再给药两次,随后从第2天至第6天每6小时口服甲氧氯普胺20mg。4. TROPDEX组64%的患者急性呕吐得到完全控制,而METDEX组为14%(P < 0.01)。TROPDEX组84%的患者急性呕吐得到完全加主要控制,而METDEX组为58%。第1天的平均呕吐发作次数TROPDEX组为1.4次,而METDEX组为3.5次(P < 0.01)。然而,两种方案在控制迟发性呕吐方面无显著差异。5. 将第二个周期随机分配至TROPDEX组的患者与第一个周期接受TROPDEX治疗的患者相比,止吐疗效降低,前者的平均急性呕吐发作次数为2次,而后者为0.8次(P < 0.01)。6. 观察到的最常见不良反应是TROPDEX组的头痛(27%)和METDEX组的头晕(40%)。7. 总之,止吐方案TROPDEX对接受高剂量顺铂化疗的中国患者有效且耐受性良好。在控制急性呕吐方面优于传统的METDEX方案,但在控制迟发性呕吐方面并非如此。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验