Suppr超能文献

为非传统气道管理训练的医师提供有效的术外气道管理。

Effective out-of-operating room airway management for physicians not traditionally trained in airway management.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

J Investig Med. 2011 Dec;59(8):1263-7. doi: 10.2130/JIM.0b013e31822ffc02.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a dearth of literature about the safety and practicality of intubation performed by an internal medicine (IM) or any other nonanesthesia, nonemergency physician.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to describe abbreviated airway management training guidelines for IM physicians staffing the emergency department and to compare the success rates between intubations performed by anesthesia and IM physicians, respectively.

METHODS

In this study, 272 consecutive out-of-operating room intubations performed by anesthesia and IM physicians were evaluated after creating and implementing an abbreviated intubation training protocol.

RESULTS

Of 165 intubations attempted by IM physicians and 107 intubations attempted by the anesthesia service, the rates of successful intubation were 93% and 99%, respectively (P = 0.02). There were no other statistically significant differences in outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Procedurally oriented IM fellows could provide a temporary solution to hospitals that currently do not have the resources to provide full-time, in-house anesthesiology or emergency physicians for management of the emergent airway.

摘要

背景

关于内科医生或任何其他非麻醉、非紧急医生进行插管的安全性和实用性,文献匮乏。

目的

本研究的目的是描述为急诊室配备的内科医生进行简化气道管理培训的指导方针,并分别比较麻醉医生和内科医生插管的成功率。

方法

在这项研究中,在创建和实施简化插管培训方案后,评估了麻醉医生和内科医生进行的 272 例非手术室插管。

结果

在 165 次由内科医生尝试的插管和 107 次由麻醉科医生尝试的插管中,插管成功率分别为 93%和 99%(P=0.02)。在其他结果方面没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

以程序为导向的内科住院医师可为目前没有资源提供全职、内部麻醉师或急诊医师来管理紧急气道的医院提供临时解决方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验