Division of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Jan;7(1):115-21. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182307f98.
In IPASS (IRESSA Pan-Asia Study), clinically selected patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma received first-line gefitinib or carboplatin/paclitaxel. This preplanned, exploratory analysis was conducted to increase understanding of the use of surrogate samples, such as serum, versus tumor biopsy samples for determining EGFR mutation status in the Japanese cohort (n = 233).
EGFR mutations were assessed using tumor tissue-derived DNA (n = 91) and circulating free (cf) DNA from pretreatment serum samples (n = 194).
Fewer patients were EGFR mutation positive when assessed using pretreatment cfDNA (23.7%) versus tumor tissue-derived DNA (61.5%). cfDNA results identified no false positives but a high rate of false negatives (56.9%). There was a significant interaction between cfDNA EGFR mutation status and treatment for progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.045). PFS was significantly longer and objective response rate (ORR) higher with gefitinib than carboplatin/paclitaxel in the cfDNA EGFR mutation-positive subgroup (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.60; p < 0.001; ORR: odds ratio [OR], 1.71; 95% CI, 0.48-6.09; 75.0% versus 63.6%; p = 0.40). There was a slight numerical advantage in PFS and ORR for gefitinib over carboplatin/paclitaxel in the cfDNA EGFR mutation-negative subgroup, likely due to the high rate of false negatives within this subgroup.
These results merit further investigation to determine whether alternative sources of tumor DNA, such as cfDNA in serum, could be used for determining EGFR mutation status in future; currently, where a sample is available, analysis of tumor material is recommended.
在 IPASS(易瑞沙泛亚研究)中,临床选择的肺腺癌患者接受一线吉非替尼或卡铂/紫杉醇治疗。本预先计划的探索性分析旨在增进对替代样本(如血清而非肿瘤活检样本)用于确定日本队列中 EGFR 突变状态的理解(n=233)。
使用肿瘤组织衍生的 DNA(n=91)和预处理血清样本中的循环游离(cf)DNA(n=194)评估 EGFR 突变。
使用预处理 cfDNA 评估时,患者 EGFR 突变阳性的比例较低(23.7% vs. 肿瘤组织衍生的 DNA 中 61.5%)。cfDNA 结果未发现假阳性,但假阴性率很高(56.9%)。cfDNA EGFR 突变状态与无进展生存期(PFS)的治疗之间存在显著交互作用(p=0.045)。在 cfDNA EGFR 突变阳性亚组中,与卡铂/紫杉醇相比,吉非替尼的 PFS 显著更长,客观缓解率(ORR)更高(PFS:风险比 [HR],0.29;95%置信区间 [CI],0.14-0.60;p<0.001;ORR:优势比 [OR],1.71;95% CI,0.48-6.09;75.0% vs. 63.6%;p=0.40)。在 cfDNA EGFR 突变阴性亚组中,吉非替尼的 PFS 和 ORR 略优于卡铂/紫杉醇,可能是由于该亚组中假阴性率较高。
这些结果值得进一步研究,以确定是否可以使用其他肿瘤 DNA 来源(如血清中的 cfDNA)来确定未来的 EGFR 突变状态;目前,在有样本的情况下,建议分析肿瘤材料。