Tony S.K. Mok, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sha Tin, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China; Yi-Long Wu and Jin-Ji Yang, Guangdong General Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou; Jie Wang, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing; You Lu, Sichuan University, Sichuan; Xiaojin Shi, AstraZeneca, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; James Chih-Hsin Yang, The National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China; Sang-We Kim, University of Ulsan College of Medicine; Myung-Ju Ahn, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Kindai University; Shinji Atagi, Kinkichuo Chest Medical Center, Osaka, Japan; Santiago Ponce, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Yuri Rukazenkov, AstraZeneca, Cambridge; Vincent Haddad, AstraZeneca, Royston, United Kingdom; Kenneth S. Thress, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA; and Jean-Charles Soria, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus and University Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 20;35(36):4027-4034. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.9250. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
Purpose The Iressa Mutation-Positive Multicentre Treatment Beyond ProgRESsion Study (IMPRESS) compared the continuation of gefitinib plus chemotherapy with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with progression (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1) after first-line gefitinib. Primary results indicated no difference between treatments in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). The current analysis presents final, mature, overall survival (OS) data, together with exploratory analyses that examined whether specific biomarkers, including T790M mutation status, were able to differentiate a relative treatment effect. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib 250 mg or placebo, in addition to cisplatin 75 mg/m plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m (maximum of six cycles of chemotherapy). EGFR mutation status was determined from plasma-derived circulating free tumor-derived DNA samples (beads, emulsification, amplification, and magnetics digital polymerase chain reaction assay, allelic fraction analysis). Results A total of 265 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned, and overall data maturity was 66%. Continuation of gefitinib plus cisplatin and pemetrexed was detrimental to OS when compared with placebo plus cisplatin and pemetrexed (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.94; P = .016; median OS, 13.4 v 19.5 months). The detriment was statistically significant in patients with T790M mutation-positive plasma samples (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.21), whereas statistical significance was not reached in T790M mutation-negative patients (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.94). PFS in T790M mutation-positive patients was similar between treatments, and the difference observed in T790M mutation-negative patients did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.03; P = .0745). Conclusion Final OS data from IMPRESS are supportive of earlier PFS results and are sufficient to warn physicians against the continuation of treatment with first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors beyond radiologic disease progression when chemotherapy is initiated. Plasma biomarker analyses suggest that this effect may be driven by T790M-positive status.
Iressa 突变阳性多中心治疗进展后研究(IMPRESS)比较了在一线吉非替尼治疗后进展(实体瘤反应评价标准 1.1)的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中继续使用吉非替尼联合化疗与安慰剂联合化疗的疗效。主要研究结果表明,两种治疗方案在无进展生存期(PFS)方面无差异。本分析报告了最终、成熟的总生存期(OS)数据,并进行了探索性分析,以评估包括 T790M 突变状态在内的特定生物标志物是否能够区分相对治疗效果。
患者随机分配接受吉非替尼 250mg 或安慰剂,加顺铂 75mg/m2 和培美曲塞 500mg/m2(最多 6 个周期的化疗)。EGFR 突变状态通过从血浆衍生的游离肿瘤衍生 DNA 样本(珠子、乳化、扩增和磁珠数字聚合酶链反应检测、等位基因分数分析)确定。
共有 265 例非小细胞肺癌患者被随机分配,总体数据成熟度为 66%。与安慰剂联合顺铂和培美曲塞相比,继续使用吉非替尼联合顺铂和培美曲塞治疗对 OS 不利(风险比 [HR],1.44;95%CI,1.07 至 1.94;P =.016;中位 OS,13.4 个月与 19.5 个月)。在 T790M 突变阳性血浆样本患者中,这种危害具有统计学意义(HR,1.49;95%CI,1.02 至 2.21),而在 T790M 突变阴性患者中未达到统计学意义(HR,1.15;95%CI,0.68 至 1.94)。T790M 突变阳性患者的 PFS 结果在两种治疗方案之间相似,而在 T790M 突变阴性患者中观察到的差异无统计学意义(HR,0.67;95%CI,0.43 至 1.03;P =.0745)。
IMPRESS 的最终 OS 数据支持更早的 PFS 结果,并足以警告医生,当开始化疗时,第一代 EGFR 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂不应在影像学疾病进展后继续使用。血浆生物标志物分析表明,这种影响可能是由 T790M 阳性状态驱动的。