Rehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria, PO Box 3010 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 3P1, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Oct;214(4):529-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2851-4. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
During rhythmic arm cycling, soleus H-reflex amplitudes are reduced by modulation of group Ia presynaptic inhibition. This suppression of reflex amplitude is graded to the frequency of arm cycling with a threshold of 0.8 Hz. Despite the data on modulation of the soleus H-reflex amplitude induced by rhythmic arm cycling, comparatively little is known about the modulation of stretch reflexes due to remote limb movement. Therefore, the present study was intended to explore the effect of arm cycling on stretch and H-reflex amplitudes in the soleus muscle. In so doing, additional information on the mechanism of action during rhythmic arm cycling would be revealed. Although both reflexes share the same afferent pathway, we hypothesized that stretch reflex amplitudes would be less suppressed by arm cycling because they are less inhibited by presynaptic inhibition. Failure to reject this hypothesis would add additional strength to the argument that Ia presynaptic inhibition is the mechanism modulating soleus H-reflex amplitude during rhythmic arm cycling. Participants were seated in a customized chair with feet strapped to footplates. Three motor tasks were performed: static control trials and arm cycling at 1 and 2 Hz. Soleus H-reflexes were evoked using single 1 ms pulses of electrical stimulation delivered to the tibial nerve at the popliteal fossa. A constant M-wave and ~6% MVC activation of soleus were maintained across conditions. Stretch reflexes were evoked using a single sinusoidal pulse at 100 Hz given by a vibratory shaker placed over the triceps surae tendon and controlled by a custom-written LabView program. Results demonstrated that rhythmic arm cycling that was effective for conditioning soleus H-reflexes did not show a suppressive effect on the amplitude of the soleus stretch reflex. We suggest this indicates that stretch reflexes are less sensitive to conditioning by rhythmic arm movement, as compared to H-reflexes, due to the relative insensitivity to Ia presynaptic inhibition.
在节律性手臂循环运动期间,比目鱼肌 H 反射幅度会通过 I 类传入神经突触前抑制的调制而减小。这种反射幅度的抑制与手臂循环的频率成比例,其阈值为 0.8 Hz。尽管有关于节律性手臂循环运动引起的比目鱼肌 H 反射幅度调制的数据,但关于由于肢体远端运动引起的伸展反射的调制却知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在探讨手臂循环运动对比目鱼肌伸展反射和 H 反射幅度的影响。通过这样做,可以揭示节律性手臂循环运动期间作用机制的更多信息。尽管这两种反射都共享相同的传入途径,但我们假设由于伸展反射受到的突触前抑制较少,因此手臂循环运动对其的抑制作用较小。如果不能否定这一假设,那么它将为 I 类传入神经突触前抑制是调节节律性手臂循环运动期间比目鱼肌 H 反射幅度的机制这一论点提供更多支持。参与者坐在定制的椅子上,双脚绑在脚蹬上。进行了三项运动任务:静态控制试验和以 1 Hz 和 2 Hz 的速度进行手臂循环运动。在腘窝处用单 1 ms 电脉冲刺激胫神经来诱发比目鱼肌 H 反射。在整个实验条件下,保持 M 波和~6%最大自主收缩(MVC)的比目鱼肌激活不变。使用放置在三头肌肌腱上的振动器施加的单个 100 Hz 正弦脉冲来诱发伸展反射,并通过定制的 LabView 程序进行控制。结果表明,对于条件反射比目鱼肌 H 反射有效的节律性手臂循环运动,并没有显示出对比目鱼肌伸展反射幅度的抑制作用。我们认为,这表明与 H 反射相比,伸展反射对节律性手臂运动的条件反射的敏感性较低,这是由于对 I 类传入神经突触前抑制的相对不敏感所致。