School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Dec;40(6):1119-27. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9806-5.
Many studies show mate choice copying effects on mate preferences in non-human species in which individuals follow or copy the mate choices of same-sex conspecifics. Recent studies suggest that social learning also influences mate preferences in humans. Studies on heterosexual humans have focused on rating the attractiveness of potential mates (targets) presented alongside individuals of the opposite sex to the target (models). Here, we examined several different types of pairing to examine how specific social learning is to mate preferences. In Study 1, we replicated a previous effect whereby target faces of the opposite sex to the subject were rated as more attractive when paired with attractive than unattractive partner models of the same sex as the subject. Using the same paired stimuli, Study 2 demonstrated no effect of a paired model if subjects were asked to rate targets who were the same sex as themselves. In Study 3, we used pairs of the same sex, stating the pair were friends, and subjects rated targets of the opposite sex to themselves. Attractive models decreased targets' attractiveness, opposite to the effect in Study 1. Finally, Study 4 examined if attractive versus unattractive non-face stimuli might influence attraction. Unlike in Study 1, pairing with attractive stimuli either had no effect or decreased the attractiveness of paired target face images. These data suggest that social transmission of preferences via pairing with attractive/unattractive images is relatively specific to learning about mate preferences but does not influence attractiveness judgments more generally.
许多研究表明,在非人类物种中,个体跟随或复制同性伴侣的择偶选择会产生配偶选择复制效应。最近的研究表明,社会学习也会影响人类的择偶偏好。对异性恋人类的研究主要集中在评估潜在配偶(目标)的吸引力上,这些目标与目标(模特)的异性个体一起呈现。在这里,我们研究了几种不同的配对方式,以研究特定的社会学习对择偶偏好的影响。在研究 1 中,我们复制了之前的一项研究结果,即当目标个体的异性面孔与具有吸引力的同性伴侣模型配对时,其吸引力被评为更高,而与不具有吸引力的同性伴侣模型配对时则更低。在研究 2 中,我们使用了相同的配对刺激物,但如果要求被试对与自己同性别的目标进行评分,则没有配对模型的影响。在研究 3 中,我们使用了同性配对,并说明配对是朋友,被试对自己的异性目标进行评分。有吸引力的模特会降低目标的吸引力,与研究 1 中的效果相反。最后,研究 4 检验了有吸引力和无吸引力的非面部刺激是否会影响吸引力。与研究 1 不同,与有吸引力的刺激配对要么没有影响,要么降低了配对目标面部图像的吸引力。这些数据表明,通过与有吸引力/无吸引力的图像配对来传递偏好的社会传递相对特定于学习择偶偏好,但不会更普遍地影响吸引力判断。