Doig Emmah, Fleming Jennifer, Kuipers Pim, Cornwell Petrea, Khan Asad
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Brain Inj. 2011;25(11):1114-25. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.607788.
To determine (i) the effectiveness of a goal-directed, environment-focused occupational therapy intervention and (ii) to compare rehabilitation gains across a day hospital (outpatient) setting and home setting.
Repeated measures cross-over design with pre-post test measures and a baseline control period, random allocation to a treatment setting sequence and an independent outcome assessor who was blinded to treatment sequence.
Descriptive and non-parametric comparative analyses employed. Fourteen participants with severe traumatic brain injury completed a 12 week outpatient occupational therapy programme. The programme was directed by the participant's chosen goals, which were established using a client-centred, structured, goal-planning process. Outcome measures included Goal attainment scaling, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, the Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale, the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Index, the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors and self-rated satisfaction with therapy.
The therapy programme resulted in significant improvements in goal attainment, occupational performance, psychosocial reintegration and ability and adjustment levels, compared with baseline. Differences in gains made in home vs day hospital settings were not statistically significant, with the exception of higher levels of patient satisfaction with therapy at home.
To assist further with decision-making about where to conduct therapy, further research is needed to compare the outcomes and determine the cost effectiveness of therapy at home and in day hospital settings.
确定(i)以目标为导向、以环境为重点的职业治疗干预措施的有效性,以及(ii)比较日间医院(门诊)环境和家庭环境中的康复效果。
采用重复测量交叉设计,包括前后测试测量和基线对照期,随机分配治疗环境顺序,且独立的结果评估者对治疗顺序不知情。
采用描述性和非参数比较分析。14名重度创伤性脑损伤患者完成了为期12周的门诊职业治疗项目。该项目由参与者选定的目标指导,这些目标通过以患者为中心、结构化的目标规划过程确定。结果测量包括目标达成量表、加拿大职业表现测量、悉尼社会心理重新融入量表、梅奥-波特兰适应性指数、克雷格医院环境因素量表以及对治疗的自我评定满意度。
与基线相比,治疗项目在目标达成、职业表现、社会心理重新融入以及能力和适应水平方面有显著改善。家庭环境和日间医院环境中康复效果的差异无统计学意义,但患者对家庭治疗的满意度较高。
为进一步协助决定治疗地点,需要进一步研究以比较结果,并确定家庭和日间医院环境中治疗的成本效益。