• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较自动最可能数技术与传统平板计数法,用于估计刚加工的肉鸡中总需氧菌、大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的数量。

Comparison of an automated most-probable-number technique with traditional plating methods for estimating populations of total aerobes, coliforms, and Escherichia coli associated with freshly processed broiler chickens.

机构信息

Poultry Microbiological Safety Research Unit, Russell Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Athens, Georgia 30604, USA.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2011 Sep;74(9):1558-63. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-024.

DOI:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-024
PMID:21902928
Abstract

An instrument (TEMPO) has been developed to automate the most-probable-number (MPN) technique and reduce the effort required to estimate some bacterial populations. We compared the automated MPN technique with traditional microbiological plating methods and Petrifilm methods for estimating the total viable count of aerobic microorganisms (TVC), total coliforms (CC), and Escherichia coli populations (EC) on freshly processed broiler chicken carcasses (postchill whole carcass rinse [WCR] samples) and cumulative drip-line samples from a commercial broiler processing facility. Overall, 120 broiler carcasses, 36 prechill drip-line samples, and 40 postchill drip-line samples were collected over 5 days (representing five individual flocks) and analyzed by the automated MPN and direct agar plating and Petrifilm methods. The TVC correlation coefficient between the automated MPN and traditional methods was very high (0.972) for the prechill drip samples, which had mean log-transformed values of 3.09 and 3.02, respectively. The TVC correlation coefficient was lower (0.710) for the postchill WCR samples, which had lower mean log values of 1.53 and 1.31, respectively. Correlations between the methods for the prechill CC and EC samples were 0.812 and 0.880, respectively. The estimated number of total aerobes was generally greater than the total number of coliforms or E. coli recovered for all sample types (P < 2e⁻¹⁶). Significantly more bacteria were recovered from the prechill samples than from the postchill WCR or cumulative drip samples (P < 9.5e⁻¹² and P < 2e⁻¹⁶, respectively). When samples below the limit of detection were excluded, 92.1% of the total responses were within a single log difference between the traditional plating or Petrifilm methods and the automated MPN method.

摘要

一种仪器(TEMPO)已经被开发出来,可以实现最可能数(MPN)技术的自动化,并减少估计某些细菌种群所需的工作量。我们将自动化 MPN 技术与传统微生物平板计数方法和 Petrifilm 方法进行了比较,以估计新鲜加工的肉鸡胴体(冷藏后整个胴体冲洗[WCR]样品)和来自商业肉鸡加工厂的累积滴线样品中的需氧微生物总数(TVC)、总大肠菌群(CC)和大肠杆菌(EC)的总数。总体而言,在 5 天内(代表五个单独的批次)共采集了 120 个肉鸡胴体、36 个预冷滴线样本和 40 个冷藏后滴线样本,并通过自动化 MPN 和直接琼脂平板计数和 Petrifilm 方法进行了分析。预冷滴线样本中,自动化 MPN 和传统方法之间的 TVC 相关系数非常高(0.972),其对数转化平均值分别为 3.09 和 3.02。冷藏后 WCR 样本的 TVC 相关系数较低(0.710),其对数转化平均值分别为 1.53 和 1.31。预冷 CC 和 EC 样本中方法之间的相关性分别为 0.812 和 0.880。对于所有样本类型,估计的总需氧菌数量通常大于总大肠菌群或大肠杆菌的数量(P < 2e⁻¹⁶)。与冷藏后 WCR 或累积滴线样本相比,预冷样本中回收的细菌数量明显更多(P < 9.5e⁻¹² 和 P < 2e⁻¹⁶,分别)。当排除低于检测限的样本时,在传统平板计数或 Petrifilm 方法与自动化 MPN 方法之间,有 92.1%的总响应在单个对数差异内。

相似文献

1
Comparison of an automated most-probable-number technique with traditional plating methods for estimating populations of total aerobes, coliforms, and Escherichia coli associated with freshly processed broiler chickens.比较自动最可能数技术与传统平板计数法,用于估计刚加工的肉鸡中总需氧菌、大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的数量。
J Food Prot. 2011 Sep;74(9):1558-63. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-024.
2
Microbiological sampling of poultry carcass portions by excision, rinsing, or swabbing.通过切除、冲洗或擦拭对家禽胴体部分进行微生物采样。
J Food Prot. 2005 Dec;68(12):2718-20. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-68.12.2718.
3
Comparison of methods for recovery and enumeration of Campylobacter from freshly processed broilers.从新鲜加工的肉鸡中回收和计数弯曲杆菌的方法比较。
J Food Prot. 2001 Jul;64(7):982-6. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-64.7.982.
4
Enumeration of total aerobic bacteria and Escherichia coli in minced meat and on carcass surface samples with an automated most-probable-number method compared with colony count protocols.采用自动最大可能数法与菌落计数法对碎肉和胴体表面样本中的需氧菌总数和大肠杆菌进行计数比较。
J Food Prot. 2006 Oct;69(10):2500-3. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.10.2500.
5
Comparison of cumulative drip sampling with whole carcass rinses for estimation of Campylobacter species and quality indicator organisms associated with processed broiler chickens.比较累积点滴采样与全胴体冲洗,以估计与加工鸡肉相关的弯曲菌属种和质量指示菌。
Poult Sci. 2013 Jan;92(1):218-24. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02217.
6
The effects on the microbiological condition of product of carcass dressing, cooling, and portioning processes at a poultry packing plant.家禽屠宰加工厂胴体修整、冷却及分割过程对产品微生物状况的影响。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 Jul 15;110(2):187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.04.020. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
7
Effect of fecal contamination and cross-contamination on numbers of coliform, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, and Salmonella on immersion-chilled broiler carcasses.粪便污染和交叉污染对沉浸式冷却肉鸡胴体上大肠菌群、大肠杆菌、弯曲杆菌和沙门氏菌数量的影响。
J Food Prot. 2005 Jul;68(7):1340-5. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-68.7.1340.
8
Comparison of neck skin excision and whole carcass rinse sampling methods for microbiological evaluation of broiler carcasses before and after immersion chilling.宰前和宰后浸烫冷却鸡只胴体微生物评估中颈皮切除与全胴体冲洗采样方法的比较。
J Food Prot. 2010 May;73(5):976-80. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.5.976.
9
Effect of prechill fecal contamination on numbers of bacteria recovered from broiler chicken carcasses before and after immersion chilling.预冷粪便污染对肉仔鸡屠体在浸水冷却前后回收的细菌数量的影响。
J Food Prot. 2004 Sep;67(9):1829-33. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.9.1829.
10
Microbiological baseline study of broiler chickens at Swedish slaughterhouses.瑞典屠宰场肉鸡的微生物基线研究。
J Food Prot. 2006 Dec;69(12):2875-82. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.12.2875.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Tempo® System: Improving the Microbiological Quality Monitoring of Human Milk.Tempo®系统评估:改善人乳微生物质量监测
Front Pediatr. 2020 Sep 2;8:494. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00494. eCollection 2020.