Williams G H, Hollenberg N K, Moore T J, Swartz S L, Dluhy R G
J Clin Invest. 1979 Mar;63(3):419-27. doi: 10.1172/JCI109318.
To determine the mechanism underlying altered adrenal responsiveness in patients with essential hypertension, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis was assessed in normotensive and hypertensive subjects using three pharmacological probes: SQ 20881, a converting enzyme inhibitor; saralasin, a competitive angiotensin antagonist with prominent agonist properties; and angiotensin itself. All subjects were studied while supine and in balance on a 10 meq Na/100 meq K intake. The decrement in plasma aldosterone with SQ 20881 in 26 hypertensive subjects (15+/-3 ng/dl) was normal (13+/-4 ng/dl), suggesting that the altered adrenal responsiveness in hypertensives is not because of a change in a postreceptor event or in the relative contribution of angiotensin to the control of aldosterone secretion. Saralasin at a dose (0.1 mug/kg per min) that reduced aldosterone levels in all normals produced a normal aldosterone decrement (14+/-3 ng/dl) in 19 patients with renovascular hypertension (12+/-4 ng/dl). The same dose, however, had no net effect on plasma aldosterone levels in 70 patients with normal or high renin essential hypertension (-1+/-1 ng/dl) despite identical metabolic balance and control renin and angiotensin levels. The altered response could be explained by an agonist effect, aldosterone rising in 45 of the essential hypertensives. There were no significant differences between normal and abnormal responders in pre- and postcortisol, -potassium, -renin and -angiotensin concentrations. Angiotensin was infused (0.1-3 ng/kg per min) in 15 patients with normal renin essential hypertension, previously studied with saralasin. A probit transformation defined the dose required to induce a 50% increase in aldosterone (ED50). In the patients in whom aldosterone rose with saralasin, the dose required to induce a 50% increase was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than in those in whom aldosterone fell normally (1.02+/-0.06 [SD] vs. 0.38+/-0.07 ng/kg per min). Vascular responses were similar in the various groups. We conclude that altered adrenal responsiveness to angiotensin in some essential hypertensive patients is secondary to a change in the interaction of angiotensin with its adrenal receptor.
为了确定原发性高血压患者肾上腺反应性改变的潜在机制,我们使用三种药理学探针评估了血压正常和高血压受试者的肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮轴:SQ 20881,一种转化酶抑制剂;沙拉新,一种具有显著激动剂特性的竞争性血管紧张素拮抗剂;以及血管紧张素本身。所有受试者均在仰卧位且钠摄入量为10 meq/钾摄入量为100 meq的平衡状态下进行研究。26名高血压受试者使用SQ 20881后血浆醛固酮的下降幅度(15±3 ng/dl)是正常的(13±4 ng/dl),这表明高血压患者肾上腺反应性的改变并非由于受体后事件的变化或血管紧张素对醛固酮分泌控制的相对贡献的改变。在所有正常受试者中能降低醛固酮水平的剂量(每分钟0.1μg/kg)的沙拉新,在19例肾血管性高血压患者中产生了正常的醛固酮下降幅度(14±3 ng/dl)(12±4 ng/dl)。然而,相同剂量对70例肾素正常或高肾素原发性高血压患者的血浆醛固酮水平没有净效应(-1±1 ng/dl),尽管他们的代谢平衡以及肾素和血管紧张素水平的控制情况相同。这种改变的反应可以用激动剂效应来解释,45例原发性高血压患者的醛固酮水平升高。正常反应者和异常反应者在皮质醇、钾、肾素和血管紧张素浓度的前后变化方面没有显著差异。对15例肾素正常的原发性高血压患者(之前已用沙拉新进行研究)输注血管紧张素(每分钟0.1 - 3 ng/kg)。概率转换确定了诱导醛固酮增加50%所需的剂量(ED50)。在使用沙拉新后醛固酮升高的患者中,诱导醛固酮增加50%所需的剂量显著高于(P < 0.001)醛固酮正常下降的患者(1.02±0.06 [标准差] 对 0.38±0.07 ng/kg每分钟)。不同组的血管反应相似。我们得出结论,一些原发性高血压患者肾上腺对血管紧张素的反应性改变是血管紧张素与其肾上腺受体相互作用变化的继发结果。