Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365C Clifton Rd, NE, Ste C4104, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 5;103(19):1452-60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr325. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
The combination of chemotherapy with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) compared with TRT alone has been shown to confer a survival advantage for good performance status patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. However, it is not known whether sequential or concurrent delivery of these therapies is the optimal combination strategy.
A total of 610 patients were randomly assigned to two concurrent regimens and one sequential chemotherapy and TRT regimen in a three-arm phase III trial. The sequential arm included cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29 and vinblastine at 5 mg/m2 per week for 5 weeks with 63 Gy TRT delivered as once-daily fractions beginning on day 50. Arm 2 used the same chemotherapy regimen as arm 1 with 63 Gy TRT delivered as once-daily fractions beginning on day 1 [corrected]. Arm 3 used cisplatin at 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 with oral etoposide at 50 mg twice daily for 10 weeks on days 1, 2, 5, and 6 with 69.6 Gy delivered as 1.2 Gy twice-daily fractions beginning on day 1. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints included tumor response and time to tumor progression. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess survival, and toxic effects were examined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Median survival times were 14.6, 17.0, and 15.6 months for arms 1-3, respectively. Five-year survival was statistically significantly higher for patients treated with the concurrent regimen with once-daily TRT compared with the sequential treatment (5-year survival: sequential, arm 1, 10% [20 patients], 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7% to 15%; concurrent, arm 2, 16% [31 patients], 95% CI = 11% to 22%, P = .046; concurrent, arm 3, 13% [22 patients], 95% CI = 9% to 18%). With a median follow-up time of 11 years, the rates of acute grade 3-5 nonhematologic toxic effects were higher with concurrent than sequential therapy, but late toxic effects were similar.
Concurrent delivery of cisplatin-based chemotherapy with TRT confers a long-term survival benefit compared with the sequential delivery of these therapies.
与单纯胸部放疗(TRT)相比,化疗联合胸部放疗(TRT)已被证明可使 III 期非小细胞肺癌患者的生存获益,这些患者具有良好的体能状态。然而,目前尚不清楚这些治疗方法是序贯还是同步应用是最佳的联合策略。
在一项三臂 III 期试验中,610 例患者被随机分配至两个同步治疗组和一个序贯化疗联合 TRT 组。序贯组包括顺铂 100mg/m2,第 1 天和第 29 天;长春碱 5mg/m2,每周 1 次,共 5 周,63GyTRT 于第 50 天开始,每日 1 次分割。第 2 组使用与第 1 组相同的化疗方案,63GyTRT 于第 1 天开始每日 1 次分割[校正]。第 3 组采用顺铂 50mg/m2,第 1、8、29 和 36 天,依托泊苷 50mg,每日 2 次,第 1、2、5 和 6 天,共 10 周,69.6Gy 于第 1 天开始以 1.2Gy 每日 2 次分割。主要终点为总生存期,次要终点包括肿瘤反应和肿瘤进展时间。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估生存情况,采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验评估毒副作用。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。
各组的中位生存时间分别为 14.6、17.0 和 15.6 个月。接受每日 1 次分割 TRT 的同步治疗组患者的 5 年生存率明显高于序贯治疗组(5 年生存率:序贯组,第 1 组,10%[20 例],95%置信区间[CI]为 7%至 15%;同步组,第 2 组,16%[31 例],95%CI=11%至 22%,P=0.046;同步组,第 3 组,13%[22 例],95%CI=9%至 18%)。中位随访时间为 11 年,与序贯治疗相比,同步治疗的急性 3-5 级非血液学毒性反应发生率较高,但晚期毒性反应相似。
与序贯应用这些疗法相比,顺铂为基础的化疗联合 TRT 的同步应用可带来长期生存获益。