Suppr超能文献

序贯与同步放化疗治疗 III 期非小细胞肺癌:RTOG9410 随机 III 期试验

Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase III trial RTOG 9410.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365C Clifton Rd, NE, Ste C4104, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 5;103(19):1452-60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr325. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The combination of chemotherapy with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) compared with TRT alone has been shown to confer a survival advantage for good performance status patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. However, it is not known whether sequential or concurrent delivery of these therapies is the optimal combination strategy.

METHODS

A total of 610 patients were randomly assigned to two concurrent regimens and one sequential chemotherapy and TRT regimen in a three-arm phase III trial. The sequential arm included cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29 and vinblastine at 5 mg/m2 per week for 5 weeks with 63 Gy TRT delivered as once-daily fractions beginning on day 50. Arm 2 used the same chemotherapy regimen as arm 1 with 63 Gy TRT delivered as once-daily fractions beginning on day 1 [corrected]. Arm 3 used cisplatin at 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 with oral etoposide at 50 mg twice daily for 10 weeks on days 1, 2, 5, and 6 with 69.6 Gy delivered as 1.2 Gy twice-daily fractions beginning on day 1. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints included tumor response and time to tumor progression. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess survival, and toxic effects were examined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Median survival times were 14.6, 17.0, and 15.6 months for arms 1-3, respectively. Five-year survival was statistically significantly higher for patients treated with the concurrent regimen with once-daily TRT compared with the sequential treatment (5-year survival: sequential, arm 1, 10% [20 patients], 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7% to 15%; concurrent, arm 2, 16% [31 patients], 95% CI = 11% to 22%, P = .046; concurrent, arm 3, 13% [22 patients], 95% CI = 9% to 18%). With a median follow-up time of 11 years, the rates of acute grade 3-5 nonhematologic toxic effects were higher with concurrent than sequential therapy, but late toxic effects were similar.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent delivery of cisplatin-based chemotherapy with TRT confers a long-term survival benefit compared with the sequential delivery of these therapies.

摘要

背景

与单纯胸部放疗(TRT)相比,化疗联合胸部放疗(TRT)已被证明可使 III 期非小细胞肺癌患者的生存获益,这些患者具有良好的体能状态。然而,目前尚不清楚这些治疗方法是序贯还是同步应用是最佳的联合策略。

方法

在一项三臂 III 期试验中,610 例患者被随机分配至两个同步治疗组和一个序贯化疗联合 TRT 组。序贯组包括顺铂 100mg/m2,第 1 天和第 29 天;长春碱 5mg/m2,每周 1 次,共 5 周,63GyTRT 于第 50 天开始,每日 1 次分割。第 2 组使用与第 1 组相同的化疗方案,63GyTRT 于第 1 天开始每日 1 次分割[校正]。第 3 组采用顺铂 50mg/m2,第 1、8、29 和 36 天,依托泊苷 50mg,每日 2 次,第 1、2、5 和 6 天,共 10 周,69.6Gy 于第 1 天开始以 1.2Gy 每日 2 次分割。主要终点为总生存期,次要终点包括肿瘤反应和肿瘤进展时间。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估生存情况,采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验评估毒副作用。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。

结果

各组的中位生存时间分别为 14.6、17.0 和 15.6 个月。接受每日 1 次分割 TRT 的同步治疗组患者的 5 年生存率明显高于序贯治疗组(5 年生存率:序贯组,第 1 组,10%[20 例],95%置信区间[CI]为 7%至 15%;同步组,第 2 组,16%[31 例],95%CI=11%至 22%,P=0.046;同步组,第 3 组,13%[22 例],95%CI=9%至 18%)。中位随访时间为 11 年,与序贯治疗相比,同步治疗的急性 3-5 级非血液学毒性反应发生率较高,但晚期毒性反应相似。

结论

与序贯应用这些疗法相比,顺铂为基础的化疗联合 TRT 的同步应用可带来长期生存获益。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Esophageal Mucosal Injuries From Drugs, Radiation, and Caustic Agents.药物、放射及腐蚀性物质所致的食管黏膜损伤
Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2025 Jun;25(2):126-133. doi: 10.7704/kjhugr.2025.0023. Epub 2025 Jun 4.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验