Suppr超能文献

在急诊科,即时护理技术与标准实验室服务:行动时间上有差异吗?一项随机试验。

Point of care technology or standard laboratory service in an emergency department: is there a difference in time to action? A randomised trial.

机构信息

Akutafdelingen, Kolding Sygehus, Kolding, Danmark.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Sep 10;19:49. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-49.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency Departments (ED) have a high flow of patients and time is often crucial. New technologies for laboratory analysis have been developed, including Point of Care Technologies (POCT), which can reduce the transport time and time of analysis significantly compared with central laboratory services. However, the question is if the time to clinical action is also reduced if a decisive laboratory answer is available during the first contact between the patient and doctor. The present study addresses this question: Does a laboratory answer, provided by POCT to the doctor who first attends the patient on admission, change the time to clinical decision in commonly occurring diseases in an ED compared with the traditional service from a central laboratory?

METHODS

We performed a randomised clinical trial with parallel design and allocation ratio 1:1. The eligibility Criteria were: All patients referred from General Practitioner or another referring doctor suspected for a deep venous thrombosis (DVT), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), acute appendicitis (AA) or acute infection (ABI). The outcome measure was the time spend from the blood sample was taken to a clinical decision was made.

RESULTS

The study period took place in October--November 2009 and from February to April 2010. 239 patients were eligible for the study. There was no difference between the groups suspected for DVT, ACS and AA, but a significant reduction in time for the ABI group (p:0.009), where the median time to decision was reduced from 7 hours and 33 minutes to 4 hours and 38 minutes when POCT was used. Only in the confirmation of ABI the time to action was significantly shorter.

CONCLUSIONS

Fast laboratory answers by POCT in an ED reduce the time to clinical decision significantly for bacterial infections. We suggest further studies which include a sufficient number of patients on deep venous thrombosis, acute appendicitis and acute coronary syndrome.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)有大量的患者,时间往往至关重要。新的实验室分析技术已经开发出来,包括即时检测技术(POCT),与中心实验室服务相比,它可以显著缩短运输时间和分析时间。然而,如果在患者与医生的首次接触时提供决定性的实验室答案,是否会缩短临床决策的时间,这是一个问题。本研究旨在回答这个问题:与传统的中心实验室服务相比,POCT 为首先接诊患者的医生提供的实验室答案是否会改变 ED 中常见疾病的临床决策时间?

方法

我们进行了一项随机临床试验,设计为平行设计,分配比例为 1:1。纳入标准为:所有由全科医生或其他转诊医生转介的疑似深静脉血栓形成(DVT)、急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)、急性阑尾炎(AA)或急性感染(ABI)的患者。主要观察指标是从采血到做出临床决策所花费的时间。

结果

研究期间为 2009 年 10 月至 11 月和 2010 年 2 月至 4 月。共有 239 名患者符合研究条件。疑似 DVT、ACS 和 AA 的两组之间没有差异,但 ABI 组的时间明显缩短(p:0.009),当使用 POCT 时,决策时间从 7 小时 33 分钟缩短至 4 小时 38 分钟。只有在确认 ABI 时,行动时间明显缩短。

结论

ED 中即时检测技术的快速实验室答案显著缩短了细菌性感染的临床决策时间。我们建议进行进一步的研究,纳入足够数量的 DVT、急性阑尾炎和急性冠状动脉综合征患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dceb/3180400/526050c0fd89/1757-7241-19-49-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验