Division of Pharmaceutics, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2011;14(3):347-57. doi: 10.18433/j3rp5k.
Investigations were carried out to assess the use of tape stripping (TS) for the determination of bioequivalence of topical products containing 1% clotrimazole.
The study design involved the establishment of an appropriate application time, which was determined by conducting a dose duration study. Subsequently, two bioequivalence studies were conducted: i) using the brand (Canesten Topical - 1% clotrimazole cream) as both the test and the reference product and ii) comparing Canesten cream with a gel product containing the same concentration of clotrimazole (1%). Each tape strip was individually analyzed for clotrimazole content using an HPLC method and Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) measurements were used to normalize the stratum corneum thicknesses between subjects.
The results of the TS investigations showed that, if the study is sufficiently powered, tape stripping may be used to determine bioequivalence according to the conventional bioequivalence limits of 0.8-1.25, as well as detect formulation differences between different clotrimazole products.
The data from this study provided compelling evidence that tape stripping has the necessary attributes and potential to be used as a tool for the bioequivalence assessment of topical clotrimazole and/or other topical formulations, thereby circumventing the need to undertake expensive and time-consuming clinical trials for such products. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.
研究了胶带剥离(TS)在评估含 1%克霉唑的局部产品生物等效性中的应用。
研究设计包括确定适当的应用时间,这是通过进行剂量持续时间研究来确定的。随后进行了两项生物等效性研究:i)使用品牌(Canesten 局部用-1%克霉唑乳膏)作为测试和参考产品;ii)比较克霉唑浓度相同的乳膏和凝胶产品(1%)。使用 HPLC 方法对每个胶带条进行克霉唑含量的单独分析,并使用经表皮水分流失(TEWL)测量来归一化受试者之间的角质层厚度。
TS 研究的结果表明,如果研究具有足够的效力,胶带剥离可能用于根据 0.8-1.25 的常规生物等效性限制来确定生物等效性,以及检测不同克霉唑产品之间的配方差异。
这项研究的数据提供了有力的证据,表明胶带剥离具有必要的属性和潜力,可作为评估局部克霉唑和/或其他局部制剂生物等效性的工具,从而避免了对这些产品进行昂贵且耗时的临床试验的需要。本文接受 POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW。注册读者(请参阅“读者”)可以通过点击问题内容页面上的 ABSTRACT 进行评论。