Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Am J Surg. 2012 Apr;203(4):467-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
The use of contrast radiography as a screening test for anastomotic integrity after esophagectomy is unclear.
Consecutive patients undergoing either transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) or pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy (PLE) with the cervical anastomosis performed by the same single surgeon were registered into a database. Anastomotic leak rate, modality of detection, and the result of esophagram (if performed) were recorded.
A total of 132 patients underwent esophagectomy (THE, 93 patients; PLE, 39 patients). Ninety-nine patients (75%) underwent contrast radiography. The overall leak rate was 12.1% (n = 16). Nine of 16 anastomotic leaks (56.3%) were detected without contrast radiography. Seven additional patients with anastomotic leaks underwent contrast radiography, 2 (28.6%) were true positives, 4 (57.1%) were false negatives, and 1 was equivocal (14.3%). Results of contrast esophagography modified patient management in only 2 instances, whereas 4 leaks were missed by this modality.
Most leaks (56.3%) were diagnosed without contrast esophagography. Contrast studies changed clinical management correctly in only 2 of 132 patients, while failing to diagnose 4 of 7 possible leaks. This study suggests that its routine use after THE or PLE is not indicated.
在食管切除术后,使用对比放射学作为吻合完整性的筛查试验的效果尚不清楚。
连续登记由同一位外科医生行经胸食管切除术(THE)或咽胃食管切除术(PLE)并进行颈部吻合的患者。记录吻合口漏的发生率、检测方式以及食管造影(如果进行)的结果。
共有 132 例患者接受了食管切除术(THE 93 例;PLE 39 例)。99 例(75%)患者进行了对比放射学检查。总的漏口发生率为 12.1%(n=16)。16 例吻合口漏中有 9 例(56.3%)在未进行对比放射学检查的情况下被发现。另外 7 例吻合口漏患者进行了对比放射学检查,其中 2 例(28.6%)为真阳性,4 例(57.1%)为假阴性,1 例为不确定(14.3%)。对比食管造影术仅在 2 例患者中改变了患者的管理,而该方法漏诊了 4 例漏口。
大多数漏口(56.3%)在未进行对比食管造影术的情况下被诊断。对比研究仅在 132 例患者中的 2 例中正确改变了临床管理,而漏诊了 7 例漏口中的 4 例。本研究表明,在 THE 或 PLE 后常规使用该方法并不合适。