• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(TRACK):评分的临床有意义变化。

Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK): clinically meaningful changes in score.

机构信息

Allergy Department, Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Region, San Diego, Calif 92111, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Nov;128(5):983-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.08.010
PMID:21906790
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) is the first validated questionnaire to assess respiratory and asthma control exclusively in young children.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the minimally important difference (MID) for interpreting meaningful changes in individual patients' TRACK scores.

METHODS

In this prospective, nonrandomized, longitudinal study conducted at 20 US pediatric sites, TRACK was administered at 2 separate clinic visits (4-6 weeks apart) to caregivers of children aged less than 5 years with symptoms consistent with asthma. Anchor-based methods were used to determine the MID from mean score differences between patients based on multiple criteria measures: physician guidelines-based respiratory control rating, physician-recommended changes to therapy, episodes of symptoms lasting more than 24 hours in the past 3 months, oral corticosteroid use for respiratory tract illnesses in the past year, physician-assessed change in control status at follow-up, and caregiver-reported change in respiratory status. The MID also was determined from distribution-based methods.

RESULTS

TRACK scores were assessed at baseline (426 caregivers) and follow-up (396 caregivers). Mean differences in TRACK scores between patients differing on criteria measures ranged from 3.4 to 16.4 points (mean, 11.1 points). Distribution-based techniques confirmed these findings. Based on logistic regression analyses, scoring 10 or more points less than 80 on TRACK was associated with an approximately 2-fold increased odds of having uncontrolled asthma or respiratory symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Changes in TRACK scores of 10 or more points represent clinically meaningful changes in respiratory control status in individual young children with respiratory symptoms consistent with asthma and should alert health care providers to re-evaluate asthma management.

摘要

背景

儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(TRACK)是第一个专门评估幼儿呼吸和哮喘控制的经过验证的问卷。

目的

我们旨在确定用于解释个体患者 TRACK 评分中有意义变化的最小重要差异(MID)。

方法

在这项前瞻性、非随机、纵向研究中,在 20 个美国儿科地点进行,TRACK 在 2 次单独的就诊时(相隔 4-6 周)由年龄小于 5 岁、有与哮喘一致症状的儿童的照顾者进行。基于多种标准措施的锚定方法用于从基于患者的平均评分差异确定 MID:基于医生指南的呼吸控制评分、医生建议的治疗改变、过去 3 个月中持续超过 24 小时的症状发作、过去一年中因呼吸道疾病使用口服皮质类固醇、随访时医生评估的控制状态变化以及照顾者报告的呼吸状态变化。MID 也可以通过分布方法确定。

结果

TRACK 评分在基线(426 名照顾者)和随访(396 名照顾者)时进行评估。在标准措施不同的患者之间,TRACK 评分的平均差异从 3.4 到 16.4 分(平均 11.1 分)。基于分布的技术证实了这些发现。基于逻辑回归分析,在 TRACK 上得分低于 80 分且相差 10 分或更多与哮喘或呼吸道症状控制不佳的可能性增加约 2 倍相关。

结论

TRACK 评分变化 10 分或更多分表示有呼吸道症状且符合哮喘的个体幼儿的呼吸控制状态发生了有临床意义的变化,这应提醒医疗保健提供者重新评估哮喘管理。

相似文献

1
Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK): clinically meaningful changes in score.儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(TRACK):评分的临床有意义变化。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Nov;128(5):983-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
2
Longitudinal validation of the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids in pediatric practices.《儿科实践中儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试的纵向验证》。
Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127(3):e737-47. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1465. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
3
Test for respiratory and asthma control in kids (TRACK): a caregiver-completed questionnaire for preschool-aged children.儿童呼吸与哮喘控制测试(TRACK):一份由照料者填写的针对学龄前儿童的问卷。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Apr;123(4):833-9.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.01.058.
4
The minimally important difference of the Asthma Control Test.哮喘控制测试的最小重要差异。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Oct;124(4):719-23.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.06.053. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
5
Validation of the Turkish version of "Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK)" questionnaire.《儿童呼吸与哮喘控制测试(TRACK)》问卷土耳其语版本的验证
J Asthma. 2013 Dec;50(10):1096-101. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.837481. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
6
Asthma Control Test: reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients not previously followed by asthma specialists.哮喘控制测试:在既往未接受哮喘专科医生随访的患者中的可靠性、有效性及反应性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Mar;117(3):549-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.01.011.
7
The impact of uncontrolled asthma on absenteeism and health-related quality of life.未控制的哮喘对缺勤率及健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Asthma. 2009 Nov;46(9):861-6. doi: 10.3109/02770900903184237.
8
Asthma control test and peak expiratory flow rate: independent pediatric asthma management tools.哮喘控制测试和呼气峰值流速:独立的儿童哮喘管理工具。
J Asthma. 2009 Dec;46(10):1042-4. doi: 10.3109/02770900903331101.
9
Development and cross-sectional validation of the Childhood Asthma Control Test.儿童哮喘控制测试的开发与横断面验证
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Apr;119(4):817-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.12.662. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
10
Uncontrolled asthma among children: impairment in social functioning and sleep.儿童未控制的哮喘:社会功能和睡眠受损。
J Asthma. 2010 Jun;47(5):539-44. doi: 10.3109/02770900903580868.

引用本文的文献

1
Point-of-Care Blood Eosinophils to Predict Preschool Wheeze Attacks.即时检测血嗜酸性粒细胞以预测学龄前喘息发作
Allergy. 2025 Apr;80(4):1038-1046. doi: 10.1111/all.16500. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Objective detection of wheeze at home by parents through a digital device: usage patterns and relationship with SABA administration.家长通过数字设备在家中对哮鸣音进行客观检测:使用模式及其与短效β2受体激动剂(SABA)使用的关系
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Jan;60(1):e27295. doi: 10.1002/ppul.27295. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
Dysfunctional neutrophil type 1 interferon responses in preschool children with recurrent wheezing and IL-4-mediated aeroallergen sensitization.
复发性喘息和白细胞介素-4介导的气源性变应原致敏的学龄前儿童中性粒细胞1型干扰素反应功能失调
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Feb 13;3(2):100229. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100229. eCollection 2024 May.
4
The Saudi initiative for asthma - 2024 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children.沙特哮喘倡议 - 2024年更新版:成人及儿童哮喘诊断与管理指南
Ann Thorac Med. 2024 Jan-Mar;19(1):1-55. doi: 10.4103/atm.atm_248_23. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
5
Functional immunophenotyping of blood neutrophils identifies novel endotypes of viral response in preschool children with recurrent wheezing.功能免疫表型分析鉴定学龄前反复喘息儿童病毒反应的新型内表型。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Dec;152(6):1433-1443. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
6
Social determinants of health influence preschool and caregiver experiences during symptoms and exacerbations of wheezing.健康的社会决定因素会影响幼儿和照顾者在喘息症状和加重期间的体验。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Jul;131(1):75-81.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.04.019. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
7
The ADEM2 project: early pathogenic mechanisms of preschool wheeze and a randomised controlled trial assessing the gain in health and cost-effectiveness by application of the breath test for the diagnosis of asthma in wheezing preschool children.ADEM2 项目:学龄前喘息的早期发病机制及应用呼吸测试诊断喘息性学龄前儿童哮喘的健康获益和成本效益的随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 3;23(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15465-6.
8
Poorer Caregiver Mental and Social Health Is Associated With Worse Respiratory Outcomes in Preschool Children With Recurrent Wheezing.照料者心理和社会健康状况较差与学龄前反复喘息儿童的呼吸结局较差相关。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Jun;11(6):1814-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.02.023. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
9
Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) of Montelukast in Children.孟鲁司特在儿童中的药物不良反应
Children (Basel). 2022 Nov 21;9(11):1783. doi: 10.3390/children9111783.
10
Efficacy of three different budesonide treatments in Chinese preschool children with recurrent wheezing.三种不同布地奈德治疗方案对中国学龄前反复喘息儿童的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 11;12(1):17043. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21505-9.