Institute of Behavioral Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan.
Department of Health, Jianan Mental Hospital, Taiwan.
J Affect Disord. 2012 Jan;136(1-2):81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.08.015. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
Bipolar-I disorder (BPI) often co-occurred with anxiety (ANX) and substance use disorders (SUD), which poses challenges in public health and clinical treatment, and adds complexity in searching for relevant etiologic factors. The present study sought to identify subgroups of BPI patients using comorbidity patterns with ANX and SUD.
Clinical patients (N=306) diagnosed with BPI were recruited and interviewed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview to collect data on demographics and clinical features, including episodic information, impairments, and lifetime diagnoses of ANX (panic, agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, specific and social phobia) and SUD (nicotine dependence, alcohol use and drug use disorder). We applied latent class analysis to empirically derive classes of BPI. A number of exogenous variables were examined for each class.
A three-class model provides excellent discriminability for subgrouping BPI patients with different comorbidity patterns. The BPI-LOW class (83.99%) had more pure mania without most lifetime comorbidity, higher numbers of last year mania episodes, and less suicidality and impairments. The BPI-ANX class (3.60%) was female predominant, tended to comorbid with multiple anxiety disorders but no SUD, and had early onset age. The BPI-SUD class (12.42%) was male predominant, had high prevalence of lifetime SUD and frequent mood episodes in the last year. Both the BPI-ANX and BPI-SUD classes had severe functional impairments and suicidal behaviors.
Clinical information was retrospectively collected. Besides, we did not comprehensively access lifetime comorbidity for all psychiatric disorders.
The three empirically identified subgroups of BPI patients exhibited distinguished comorbidity patterns and clinical features, including suicidal behaviors, frequent mood episodes and functional impairments. Our findings have clinical implication in intervention and treatment as well as to explore their different underlying mechanisms.
双相情感障碍 I 型(BPI)常与焦虑(ANX)和物质使用障碍(SUD)共病,这给公共卫生和临床治疗带来了挑战,并增加了寻找相关病因因素的复杂性。本研究旨在通过 BPI 与 ANX 和 SUD 的共病模式来识别 BPI 患者的亚组。
招募了 306 名临床诊断为 BPI 的患者,并使用复合国际诊断访谈进行访谈,以收集人口统计学和临床特征数据,包括发作信息、障碍和 ANX(惊恐障碍、广场恐怖症、广泛性焦虑障碍、特定和社交恐惧症)和 SUD(尼古丁依赖、酒精使用障碍和药物使用障碍)的终生诊断。我们应用潜在类别分析从经验上推导出 BPI 的类别。检查了每个类别的多个外生变量。
三类别模型为亚组 BPI 患者提供了不同共病模式的良好区分能力。BPI-LOW 类(83.99%)具有更多的单纯躁狂,没有大多数终生共病,更多的去年躁狂发作,以及较少的自杀意念和障碍。BPI-ANX 类(3.60%)以女性为主,倾向于共患多种焦虑障碍,但无 SUD,发病年龄较早。BPI-SUD 类(12.42%)以男性为主,终生 SUD 患病率高,去年情绪发作频繁。BPI-ANX 和 BPI-SUD 类均有严重的功能障碍和自杀行为。
临床信息是回顾性收集的。此外,我们没有全面评估所有精神障碍的终生共病情况。
三种经验识别的 BPI 患者亚组表现出明显的共病模式和临床特征,包括自杀行为、频繁的情绪发作和功能障碍。我们的研究结果在干预和治疗方面具有临床意义,并探索了它们不同的潜在机制。