de Graaf Ron, Bijl Rob V, Ten Have Margreet, Beekman Aartjan T F, Vollebergh Wilma A M
Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Da Costakade 45, 3521 VS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2004 Nov 1;82(3):461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.03.001.
To describe transitions to comorbidity within a 3-year period in three cohorts of subjects with at baseline a 12-month pure mood, anxiety or substance use disorder but no lifetime history of any other disorder category. To assess the role of personal and social vulnerability factors, life events, clinical factors and functional disability in the pathway to comorbidity.
Data were derived from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS), a prospective epidemiologic study of a representative sample of 7076 adults aged 18-65, interviewed in three waves (baseline, 1 and 3 years after baseline) with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview.
15.2% of 99 pure mood, 10.5% of 220 anxiety and 6.8% of 192 substance use disorder cases became comorbid. Comorbid transition from pure mood disorder was multivariately associated with higher age, external mastery and severity of the disorder. Comorbidity developing from pure anxiety disorder was associated with past and recent stressful life circumstances (childhood trauma, negative life events) and physical functional disability. Predictors of comorbid transition from pure substance use disorder were personal and social vulnerability variables only (high neuroticism, low social support).
Although NEMESIS was performed among a substantial number of cases, the number of cases with a pure disorder at baseline subsequently developing comorbidity was low. This limited analysing determinants of different comorbid conditions.
Risk factors for comorbid transitions vary depending on whether subjects have a primary mood, anxiety or substance use disorder. Interventions aimed at primary prevention of comorbidity to reduce psychiatric burden in populations with a history of pure disorders are indicated in response to clearly identified risk factors.
描述三组在基线时患有12个月单纯情绪、焦虑或物质使用障碍但无任何其他障碍类别终生病史的受试者在3年期间向共病的转变情况。评估个人和社会脆弱性因素、生活事件、临床因素和功能残疾在共病发展途径中的作用。
数据来自荷兰精神健康调查与发病率研究(NEMESIS),这是一项对7076名18 - 65岁成年人的代表性样本进行的前瞻性流行病学研究,通过综合国际诊断访谈分三轮(基线、基线后1年和3年)进行访谈。
99例单纯情绪障碍病例中有15.2%、220例焦虑障碍病例中有10.5%、192例物质使用障碍病例中有6.8%出现了共病。从单纯情绪障碍向共病的转变在多变量分析中与年龄较大、外部掌控感和障碍的严重程度相关。从单纯焦虑障碍发展而来的共病与过去和近期的压力性生活状况(童年创伤、负面生活事件)以及身体功能残疾有关。从单纯物质使用障碍向共病转变的预测因素仅为个人和社会脆弱性变量(高神经质、低社会支持)。
尽管NEMESIS研究涉及大量病例,但基线时患有单纯障碍随后发展为共病的病例数量较少。这限制了对不同共病情况决定因素的分析。
共病转变的风险因素因受试者最初患有情绪、焦虑还是物质使用障碍而有所不同。针对有单纯障碍病史人群进行共病一级预防以减轻精神负担的干预措施,应根据明确识别出的风险因素来实施。