Mjarkesh M M, Morel X, Renard G
Service d'ophtalmologie, Hôtel-Dieu de Paris, 1, parvis Notre-Dame, 75004 Paris, France.
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012 Feb;35(2):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.02.021. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
To objectively analyze the cutaneous scar after external dacryocystorhinostomy and to compare the cosmetic result of a nasal incision and an inferior eyelid incision.
All patients consecutively operated between January 2007 and December 2009 were notified of an examination. The cutaneous scar was photographed and de visu analyzed by the two authors who gave marks : 20, no visible scar ; 10, visible scar but cosmetically considered not detrimental ; 0, visible scar and considered unesthetic.
Eighteen of the 60 patients notified came for examination. One hundred percent of ten patients operated via an inferior eyelid incision were graded 20 versus 25% of eight patients operated via a nasal incision. Of these patients, 62.5% were graded 10. Only one patient was marked 0 (nasal incision).
The inferior eyelid incision seemed to give much better cosmetic results than the nasal incision.
客观分析外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术后的皮肤瘢痕，并比较鼻切口和下睑切口的美容效果。
通知了2007年1月至2009年12月期间连续接受手术的所有患者进行检查。由两位作者对皮肤瘢痕进行拍照并直观分析，评分标准为：20分，无可见瘢痕；10分，有可见瘢痕但美容上认为无害；0分，有可见瘢痕且不美观。
通知检查的60例患者中有18例前来检查。经下睑切口手术的10例患者中100%评分为20分，而经鼻切口手术的8例患者中25%评分为20分。在这些患者中，62.5%评分为10分。只有1例患者评分为0分（鼻切口）。
下睑切口似乎比鼻切口具有更好的美容效果。
