• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合疼痛咨询和疼痛教育计划可降低肿瘤门诊患者的平均和当前疼痛,并降低疼痛对日常生活的干扰:一项随机对照试验。

A combined pain consultation and pain education program decreases average and current pain and decreases interference in daily life by pain in oncology outpatients: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Department of Trial and Statistics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pain. 2011 Nov;152(11):2632-2639. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2011.08.009
PMID:21906879
Abstract

Pain education programs (PEP) and pain consultations (PC) have been studied to overcome patient-related and professional-related barriers in cancer pain management. These interventions were studied separately, not in combination, and half of the studies reported a significant improvement in pain. Moreover, most PEP studies did not mention the adequacy of pain treatment. We studied the effect of PC combined with PEP on pain and interference by pain with daily functioning in comparison to standard care (SC). Patients were randomly assigned to SC (n=37) or PC-PEP (n=35). PEP consisted of patient-tailored pain education and weekly monitoring of pain and side effects. We measured overall reduction in pain intensity and daily interference over an 8-week period as well as adequacy of pain treatment and adherence. The overall reduction in pain intensity and daily interference was significantly greater after randomization to PC-PEP than to SC (average pain 31% vs 20%, P=.03; current pain 30% vs 16%, P=.016; interference 20% vs 2.5%, P=.01). Adequacy of pain management did not differ between the groups. Patients were more adherent to analgesics after randomization to PC-PEP than to SC (P=.03). In conclusion, PC-PEP improves pain, daily interference, and patient adherence in oncology outpatients.

摘要

疼痛教育计划(PEP)和疼痛咨询(PC)已被研究用于克服癌症疼痛管理中与患者相关和与专业相关的障碍。这些干预措施是分开研究的,而不是结合在一起研究的,其中一半的研究报告疼痛有显著改善。此外,大多数 PEP 研究都没有提到疼痛治疗的充分性。我们研究了 PC 与 PEP 联合应用对疼痛和疼痛对日常功能的干扰的影响,与标准护理(SC)进行比较。患者被随机分配到 SC(n=37)或 PC-PEP(n=35)组。PEP 包括针对患者的疼痛教育和每周监测疼痛和副作用。我们在 8 周的时间内测量了疼痛强度和日常干扰的总体减轻程度,以及疼痛治疗的充分性和依从性。与 SC 相比,随机分配到 PC-PEP 组后疼痛强度和日常干扰的总体减轻程度显著更大(平均疼痛减轻 31%比 20%,P=.03;当前疼痛减轻 30%比 16%,P=.016;干扰减轻 20%比 2.5%,P=.01)。两组之间的疼痛管理充分性没有差异。与 SC 相比,随机分配到 PC-PEP 组后患者对镇痛药的依从性更高(P=.03)。总之,PC-PEP 可改善肿瘤门诊患者的疼痛、日常干扰和患者依从性。

相似文献

1
A combined pain consultation and pain education program decreases average and current pain and decreases interference in daily life by pain in oncology outpatients: a randomized controlled trial.联合疼痛咨询和疼痛教育计划可降低肿瘤门诊患者的平均和当前疼痛,并降低疼痛对日常生活的干扰:一项随机对照试验。
Pain. 2011 Nov;152(11):2632-2639. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
2
Improving the quality of pain treatment by a tailored pain education programme for cancer patients in chronic pain.通过为慢性疼痛的癌症患者量身定制疼痛教育计划来提高疼痛治疗质量。
Eur J Pain. 2001;5(3):241-56. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0239.
3
Adherence to Analgesics in Oncology Outpatients: Focus on Taking Analgesics on Time.肿瘤门诊患者对镇痛药的依从性:按时服用镇痛药为重点。
Pain Pract. 2017 Jun;17(5):616-624. doi: 10.1111/papr.12490. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
4
Pain and its interference with daily activities in medical oncology outpatients.肿瘤内科门诊患者的疼痛及其对日常活动的干扰。
Pain Physician. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(4):379-89.
5
Interactive Voice Response-Based Self-management for Chronic Back Pain: The COPES Noninferiority Randomized Trial.基于交互式语音应答的慢性背痛自我管理:COPES非劣效性随机试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):765-773. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0223.
6
Randomized controlled trial of standardized education and telemonitoring for pain in outpatients with advanced solid tumors.随机对照试验标准化教育和远程监测对晚期实体瘤门诊患者疼痛的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1751-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1722-x. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
7
Effects of pain education program on pain intensity, pain treatment satisfaction, and barriers in Turkish cancer patients.疼痛教育项目对土耳其癌症患者疼痛强度、疼痛治疗满意度及障碍的影响。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2009 Dec;10(4):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2007.09.004. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
8
Prescription Opioid Taper Support for Outpatients With Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.针对慢性疼痛门诊患者的处方阿片类药物减量支持:一项随机对照试验。
J Pain. 2017 Mar;18(3):308-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
9
Chronic Pain Features Relate to Quality of Life More than Physiopathology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation in Pain Clinics.慢性疼痛特征与生活质量的关联大于与病理生理学的关联:疼痛诊所的横断面评估
Pain Pract. 2017 Sep;17(7):866-878. doi: 10.1111/papr.12533. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
10
A randomized, clinical trial of education or motivational-interviewing-based coaching compared to usual care to improve cancer pain management.一项将基于教育或动机性访谈的指导与常规护理进行比较以改善癌症疼痛管理的随机临床试验。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 Jan;39(1):39-49. doi: 10.1188/12.ONF.39-49.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Nonpharmacological Interventions in the Management of Chemotherapy Physical Side Effects: A Systematic Review.非药物干预措施在化疗身体副作用管理中的有效性:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 19;12(18):1880. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12181880.
2
The Impact of Pain Education Interventions for Cancer Survivors and Caregivers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.疼痛教育干预对癌症幸存者及其照顾者的影响:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 5;16(13):2468. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132468.
3
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Education in Patients with Cancer Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
癌症疼痛患者的治疗性教育效果:系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;15(16):4123. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164123.
4
Effects of Good Pain Management (GPM) ward program on patterns of care and pain control in patients with cancer pain in Taiwan.良好疼痛管理(GPM)病房方案对台湾癌症疼痛患者护理模式和疼痛控制的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Apr;29(4):1903-1911. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05656-x. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
5
Standards for the management of cancer-related pain across Europe-A position paper from the EFIC Task Force on Cancer Pain.欧洲癌症相关疼痛管理标准-欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织癌症疼痛工作组的立场文件。
Eur J Pain. 2019 Apr;23(4):660-668. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1346. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
6
Desmoid fibromatosis through the patients' eyes: time to change the focus and organisation of care?从患者角度看韧带样纤维瘤病:是否需要改变关注焦点和护理组织形式?
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Mar;27(3):965-980. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4386-8. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
7
Improving the management of pain from advanced cancer in the community: study protocol for a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial.改善社区晚期癌症患者的疼痛管理:一项实用多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 22;8(3):e021965. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021965.
8
Development and feasibility of a web application to monitor patients' cancer-related pain.开发并验证一个用于监测癌症患者疼痛的网络应用程序的可行性。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):635-642. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3877-3. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
9
The effectiveness of the quality program Pac-IficO to improve pain management in hospitalized cancer patients: a before-after cluster phase II trial.Pac-IficO 质量项目提高住院癌症患者疼痛管理效果的研究:前后群组二期临床试验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Mar 29;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-15.
10
The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care.欧洲慢性疼痛的个人和社会负担:需要进行战略优先排序并采取行动,以提高对适当护理的认识和可及性。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 24;13:1229. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1229.