• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团体认知行为疗法与选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗强迫症的比较:一项实用临床试验。

Group cognitive-behavioral therapy versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a practical clinical trial.

机构信息

Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Clinical Hospital, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2012 Jan;26(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.08.008
PMID:21907540
Abstract

Clinical effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioral therapy (GCBT) versus fluoxetine in obsessive-compulsive disorder outpatients that could present additional psychiatric comorbidities was assessed. Patients (18-65 years; baseline Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive-Scale [Y-BOCS] scores ≥ 16; potentially presenting additional psychiatric comorbidities) were sequentially allocated for treatment with GCBT (n=70) or fluoxetine (n=88). Mean Y-BOCS scores decreased by 23.13% in the GCBT and 21.54% in the SSRI groups (p=0.875). Patients presented a mean of 2.7 psychiatric comorbidities, and 81.4% showed at least one additional disorder. A reduction of at least 35% in baseline Y-BOCS scores and CGI ratings of 1 (much better) or 2 (better) was achieved by 33.3% of GCBT patients and 27.7% in the SSRI group (p=0.463). The Y-BOCS reduction was significantly lower in patients with one or more psychiatric comorbidities (21.15%, and 18.73%, respectively) than in those with pure OCD (34.62%; p=0.034). Being male, having comorbidity of Major Depression, Social Phobia, or Dysthymia predicted a worse response to both treatments. Response rates to both treatments were similar and lower than reported in the literature, probably due to the broad inclusion criteria and the resulting sample more similar to the real world population.

摘要

评估了团体认知行为疗法 (GCBT) 与氟西汀治疗伴有潜在共病精神障碍的强迫症门诊患者的临床疗效。患者(18-65 岁;基线耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表 [Y-BOCS] 评分≥16;可能存在其他共病精神障碍)先后被分配接受 GCBT(n=70)或氟西汀(n=88)治疗。GCBT 组的 Y-BOCS 评分平均下降 23.13%,SSRI 组下降 21.54%(p=0.875)。患者共存在 2.7 种精神共病,81.4%至少存在一种其他障碍。GCBT 组有 33.3%和 SSRI 组有 27.7%的患者达到 Y-BOCS 基线评分至少下降 35%和 CGI 评分 1(明显好转)或 2(好转)。有 1 种或更多精神共病的患者 Y-BOCS 评分下降显著低于仅有强迫症的患者(分别为 21.15%和 18.73%)(p=0.034)。男性、共患重性抑郁障碍、社交恐惧症或心境恶劣障碍预示着对两种治疗的反应更差。两种治疗的反应率与文献报道相似且低于文献报道,可能是由于纳入标准广泛,导致样本更接近真实世界人群。

相似文献

1
Group cognitive-behavioral therapy versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a practical clinical trial.团体认知行为疗法与选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗强迫症的比较:一项实用临床试验。
J Anxiety Disord. 2012 Jan;26(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
2
Clinical predictors of long-term outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症长期预后的临床预测因素。
Depress Anxiety. 2013 Aug;30(8):763-72. doi: 10.1002/da.22013. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
3
Cognitive-behavioral therapy as an adjunct to serotonin reuptake inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open trial.认知行为疗法作为5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗强迫症的辅助疗法:一项开放性试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;60(9):584-90. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v60n0904.
4
Adaptive treatment strategies for children and adolescents with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.适应治疗策略在儿童和青少年强迫症中的应用:一项序贯多项分配随机试验。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Aug;58:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
Sertraline and fluoxetine treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: results of a double-blind, 6-month treatment study.舍曲林与氟西汀治疗强迫症:一项为期6个月的双盲治疗研究结果
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 Apr;22(2):148-54. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200204000-00007.
6
Long-term follow-up and predictors of clinical outcome in obsessive-compulsive patients treated with serotonin reuptake inhibitors and behavioral therapy.使用5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和行为疗法治疗的强迫症患者的长期随访及临床结局预测因素
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;62(7):535-40. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n07a06.
7
Differential prefrontal gray matter correlates of treatment response to fluoxetine or cognitive-behavioral therapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症患者接受氟西汀或认知行为疗法治疗的反应存在前额叶灰质差异的相关性。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Jul;23(7):569-80. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
8
Addition of cognitive-behaviour therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder patients non-responding to fluoxetine.为对氟西汀无反应的强迫症患者添加认知行为疗法。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002 Oct;106(4):314-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.01261.x.
9
Can early improvement be an indicator of treatment response in obsessive-compulsive disorder? Implications for early-treatment decision-making.早期改善能否作为强迫症治疗反应的指标?对早期治疗决策的启示。
J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Nov;47(11):1700-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
10
Cognitive behavior therapy in medication non-responders with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.强迫症药物治疗抵抗患者认知行为治疗的前瞻性 1 年随访研究。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Oct;25(7):939-45. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Hereditary Patterns and Genetic Associations in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): Neuropsychiatric Insights, Genetic Influences, and Treatment Perspectives.强迫症(OCD)的遗传模式与基因关联:神经精神学见解、基因影响及治疗前景
Curr Gene Ther. 2025;25(3):257-316. doi: 10.2174/0115665232316708240828063527.
2
Characteristics of Patients With Intractable Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder With High/Low Responsiveness to Gamma Knife Surgery.对伽玛刀手术反应高/低的难治性强迫症患者的特征
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Jun;21(6):629-636. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0063. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
Obsessive-compulsive disorder among individuals of Hispanic and Latin American ancestry: Cultural considerations for assessment and psychotherapy.
西班牙语裔和拉丁裔个体中的强迫症:评估和心理治疗的文化考虑。
Bull Menninger Clin. 2024 Spring;88(2):148-170. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2024.88.2.148.
4
Brazilian research consortium on obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders guidelines for the treatment of adult obsessive-compulsive disorder. Part II: Cognitive-Behavior Therapy treatment.巴西强迫症谱系障碍研究联盟成人强迫症治疗指南。第二部分:认知行为疗法治疗
Braz J Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 17;45(5):431-47. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3081.
5
The Efficacy and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation of Combined Anterior Limb of Internal Capsule and Nucleus Accumbens (ALIC/NAcc-DBS) for Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Protocol of a Multicenter, Randomized, and Double-Blinded Study.内囊前肢和伏隔核联合深部脑刺激(ALIC/NAcc-DBS)治疗难治性强迫症的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲研究方案
Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 16;12(7):933. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12070933.
6
The Inflating Impact of Waiting-List Controls on Effect Size Estimates.等待名单控制对效应量估计的膨胀影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 22;13:877089. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.877089. eCollection 2022.
7
Efficacy of group cognitive-behavioral therapy in adolescents with obsessive compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.团体认知行为疗法对青少年强迫症患者的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 23;44(4):449-60. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2021-2264.
8
Does Christian Spirituality Enhance Psychological Interventions on Forgiveness, Gratitude, and the Meaning of Life? A Quasi-Experimental Intervention with the Elderly and Youth.基督教灵性是否能增强关于宽恕、感恩和生命意义的心理干预?一项针对老年人和年轻人的准实验干预研究。
Nurs Rep. 2020 Dec 17;10(2):182-206. doi: 10.3390/nursrep10020022.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.重复经颅磁刺激治疗成人强迫症的疗效和耐受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 May 28;11(1):332. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01453-0.
10
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Laser Thermal Ventral Capsulotomy for Intractable Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.磁共振引导激光热腹侧神经切断术治疗难治性强迫症。
Neurosurgery. 2021 May 13;88(6):1128-1135. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab050.