Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos, 6627-ZIP code 31270.901 sala 3304, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Aug;8(8):3277-86. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8083277. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
The present study assesses the validity and reproducibility of two occlusal indices for epidemiological studies--the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and the Dental Health Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (DHC-IOTN) for the identification of orthodontic treatment needs. The total of 131 study models was examined by an examiner (orthodontic specialist) for the determination of the DAI and DHC-IOTN. Thirty days later, further assessment was performed to determine the reproducibility. The duration of each exam was measured in seconds with a stopwatch. The indices were compared by a panel of three experts in orthodontics to evaluate validity. The intra-examiner reliability evaluation resulted in an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89 for the DAI (95% CI = 0.64 to 1.0) and 0.87 for the DHC-IOTN (95% CI = 0.56 to 0.96). The time spent on the evaluation of the DHC-IOTN was less than the time spent on that of the DAI (P < 0.001). The accuracy of the indices, as reflected by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, was 61% for the DAI (95% CI = 51 to 70; p = 0.037) and 67% for the DHC-IOTN (95% CI = 58 to 77; p = 0.001). Both indices presented good reproducibility and validity.
本研究评估了两种用于流行病学研究的咬合指数——牙齿美学指数(DAI)和正畸治疗需求的口腔健康成分指数(DHC-IOTN)——用于确定正畸治疗需求的有效性和可重复性。由一名检查者(正畸专家)对总共 131 个研究模型进行检查,以确定 DAI 和 DHC-IOTN。30 天后,进一步评估以确定可重复性。每个检查的持续时间用秒表测量。通过一个由三名正畸专家组成的小组对指数进行比较,以评估其有效性。内部检查员可靠性评估得出 DAI 的组内相关系数为 0.89(95%置信区间=0.64 至 1.0),DHC-IOTN 的组内相关系数为 0.87(95%置信区间=0.56 至 0.96)。评估 DHC-IOTN 所花费的时间少于评估 DAI 所花费的时间(P<0.001)。反映在接收者操作特征曲线下面积的指数准确性为 DAI 的 61%(95%置信区间=51 至 70;p=0.037)和 DHC-IOTN 的 67%(95%置信区间=58 至 77;p=0.001)。这两个指数都具有良好的可重复性和有效性。