Klein Andrea, Jungbluth Heinz, Clement Emma, Lillis Suzanne, Abbs Stephen, Munot Pinki, Pane Marika, Wraige Elizabeth, Schara Ulrike, Straub Volker, Mercuri Eugenio, Muntoni Francesco
Departments of Paediatric Neurology, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Arch Neurol. 2011 Sep;68(9):1171-9. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.188.
To establish the consistency of the previously reported pattern of muscle involvement in a large cohort of patients with molecularly defined ryanodine receptor type 1 (RYR1)-related myopathies, to identify possible additional patterns, and to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings with clinical and genetic findings.
Blinded analysis of muscle MRI patterns of patients with congenital myopathies with dominant or recessive RYR1 mutations and control patients without RYR1 mutations. We compared MRI findings with the previously reported pattern of muscle involvement.
Data from 3 tertiary referral centers.
Thirty-seven patients with dominant or recessive RYR1 mutations and 23 controls with other myopathies.
Each MRI was classified as typical if it was identical to the reported pattern, consistent if it was similar to the reported one but with some additional features, or different. Images with no or few changes were classified as uninformative.
Twenty-one of 37 patients with RYR1 mutations had a typical pattern; 13 had a consistent pattern. Two patients had uninformative MRIs and only 1 had a different pattern. Compared with patients with dominant mutations, patients with recessive mutations and ophthalmoparesis had a more diffuse pattern, classified as consistent in 6 of 8. In contrast, 10 of 11 with recessive mutations but without ophthalmoparesis had a typical pattern. All MRIs of 23 control patients were classified as different.
Our results suggest that muscle MRI is a powerful predictor of RYR1 involvement in patients with a congenital myopathy, especially if they carry a dominant mutation or recessive mutations without ophthalmoparesis.
在一大群分子定义的1型兰尼碱受体(RYR1)相关肌病患者中,确定先前报道的肌肉受累模式的一致性,识别可能的其他模式,并将磁共振成像(MRI)结果与临床和基因结果进行比较。
对具有显性或隐性RYR1突变的先天性肌病患者和无RYR1突变的对照患者的肌肉MRI模式进行盲法分析。我们将MRI结果与先前报道的肌肉受累模式进行比较。
来自3个三级转诊中心的数据。
37例具有显性或隐性RYR1突变的患者和23例患有其他肌病的对照者。
如果每个MRI与报道的模式相同,则分类为典型;如果与报道的模式相似但有一些额外特征,则分类为一致;如果不同,则分类为不同。没有或几乎没有变化的图像分类为无信息。
37例RYR1突变患者中有21例具有典型模式;13例具有一致模式。2例患者的MRI无信息性,只有1例具有不同模式。与显性突变患者相比,隐性突变和眼肌麻痹患者的模式更弥漫,8例中有6例分类为一致。相比之下,11例隐性突变但无眼肌麻痹的患者中有10例具有典型模式。23例对照患者的所有MRI均分类为不同。
我们的结果表明,肌肉MRI是先天性肌病患者RYR1受累的有力预测指标,特别是如果他们携带显性突变或无眼肌麻痹的隐性突变患者