• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创新癌症疗法:将成本纳入考虑。

Innovative cancer therapies: putting costs into context.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France. dk@cancer med.fr

出版信息

Cancer. 2012 May 1;118(9):2367-71. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26496. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.26496
PMID:21918962
Abstract

The costs of cancer care are rising, and spending on expensive innovative anticancer agents is likely to come under scrutiny as health care payers are confronted by the challenge of resource limits in the face of infinite demand. Indirect costs account for the major part of total attributable costs of cancer and are dominated by the cost of mortality in individuals of working age (who therefore do not contribute to economic productivity). Although cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and premature mortality, in 2007, it was estimated that cancer accounted for only around 6% of the total health care costs in Europe. It is estimated that cancer drug costs constitute around 12% of total direct cancer costs and 5% of the costs of all drugs. Countries vary in their uptake of novel anticancer agents. However, even in France--a leading nation for the use of these agents--the costs of innovative anticancer drugs accounted for <0.6% of total health care expenditure in 2006. Population-level data suggest that novel therapies have contributed (together with advances in screening and other aspects of care) to improvements in survival from cancer. If this is the case, then the potential reduction in the associated indirect costs could exceed the direct costs associated with the uptake of innovative drug therapies. Further research is required to establish the costs and benefits of novel agents in routine practice.

摘要

癌症治疗的成本不断上升,随着医疗保健支付者面临资源有限与无限需求的挑战,昂贵的创新抗癌药物的支出可能会受到审查。间接成本占癌症总可归因成本的主要部分,主要由工作年龄个体的死亡率成本(因此他们不会对经济生产力做出贡献)决定。尽管癌症是发病率和过早死亡的主要原因,但据估计,2007 年,癌症仅占欧洲总医疗保健费用的 6%左右。据估计,癌症药物成本约占直接癌症总成本的 12%和所有药物成本的 5%。各国对新型抗癌药物的采用情况存在差异。然而,即使在法国——这些药物使用的领先国家——2006 年创新抗癌药物的成本也仅占总医疗保健支出的<0.6%。人群水平的数据表明,新型疗法(连同筛查和护理的其他方面的进步)有助于提高癌症的生存率。如果情况确实如此,那么与采用创新药物治疗相关的间接成本的潜在减少可能会超过直接成本。需要进一步研究以确定常规实践中新型药物的成本和效益。

相似文献

1
Innovative cancer therapies: putting costs into context.创新癌症疗法:将成本纳入考虑。
Cancer. 2012 May 1;118(9):2367-71. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26496. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
2
[The cost of chemotherapy].[化疗的费用]
Bull Cancer. 2003 Nov;90(11):976-82.
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.美国临床肿瘤学会指导声明:癌症护理的成本
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3868-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1183. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
4
[Cost of medications in the oncology sector in the context of health economics].[健康经济学背景下肿瘤领域药物的成本]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2008;158(7-8):227-33. doi: 10.1007/s10354-007-0504-9.
5
[Health care expenditures linked to the use of targeted therapies and diagnostic tests for cancer patients].[与癌症患者使用靶向治疗和诊断检测相关的医疗保健支出]
Med Sci (Paris). 2012 Mar;28 Spec No 1:19-23. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2012281s106. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
6
European perspective on the costs and cost-effectiveness of cancer therapies.欧洲对癌症治疗成本及成本效益的看法。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 10;25(2):191-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.8956.
7
Costs of illness: United States, 1980.疾病成本:美国,1980年。
Natl Med Care Util Expend Surv C. 1986 Apr(3):1-90.
8
Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.北欧国家癌症筛查对截至2017年的死亡、成本和生活质量的影响。
Acta Oncol. 1997;36 Suppl 9:1-60.
9
Outpatient cancer drug costs: changes, drivers, and the future.门诊癌症药物费用:变化、驱动因素及未来
Cancer. 2002 Feb 15;94(4):1142-50.
10
The economic burden of cancer in Korea in 2002.2002年韩国癌症的经济负担。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Mar;17(2):136-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00818.x. Epub 2007 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the effect of optimizing anticancer drug vials on medical costs in Japan based on the data from a cancer hospital.基于癌症医院的数据估计优化抗癌药物小瓶对日本医疗费用的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):1017. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05822-1.
2
Comparing the Approval and Coverage Decisions of New Oncology Drugs in the United States and Other Selected Countries.比较美国和其他选定国家新肿瘤药物的批准和覆盖决策。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Feb;23(2):247-254. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.2.247.
3
An Anticancer Drug Unit for the whole provincial oncologic network of Piacenza: improving safety and savings.
皮亚琴察全省肿瘤网络的抗癌药物单元:提高安全性并节省开支。
Med Oncol. 2015 Feb;32(2):457. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0457-y. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
4
Drug waste minimization as an effective strategy of cost-containment in oncology.药物减量作为肿瘤学中成本控制的有效策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 7;14:57. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-57.
5
A catalyst for change: the European cancer Patient's Bill of Rights.变革的催化剂:《欧洲癌症患者权利法案》
Oncologist. 2014 Mar;19(3):217-24. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0452. Epub 2014 Feb 3.