1Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
J Hum Lact. 2011 Nov;27(4):367-77. doi: 10.1177/0890334411409751. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate breastfeeding information in midwifery textbooks. Evaluation standards were developed in order to perform content analysis. A 3-round Delphi method using a panel of 32 midwives resulted in 36 evaluation items from the original 38 draft items based on 4 major international guidelines and statements on breastfeeding. Subsequently, breastfeeding descriptions in 4 midwifery textbooks most frequently used in Japan were examined using a 4-point scale (A, accurate and sufficient description; B, accurate but insufficient description; C, no description; and D, inaccurate or inconsistent description). Among the evaluation items, 40% were rated as A, 25% as C, 21% as B, and 15% as D across the 4 textbooks. In conclusion, a substantial proportion of breastfeeding information in these textbooks was found to be inaccurate, inconsistent, or insufficient in content.
本研究旨在评估助产士教科书内的母乳喂养信息。为了进行内容分析,制定了评估标准。通过使用 32 名助产士组成的小组进行了 3 轮 Delphi 方法,基于 4 项主要的国际母乳喂养指南和声明,从最初的 38 项草案中确定了 36 项评估项目。随后,使用 4 分制(A,准确且充分的描述;B,准确但不充分的描述;C,无描述;和 D,不准确或不一致的描述)对日本最常使用的 4 本助产士教科书中的母乳喂养描述进行了检查。在评估项目中,4 本教材中有 40%被评为 A,25%为 C,21%为 B,15%为 D。总之,这些教材中的母乳喂养信息在内容上存在大量不准确、不一致或不充分的情况。