Suppr超能文献

剂量试验为何失败?

Why did dose trials fail?

作者信息

Joannidis Michael

机构信息

Medical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Contrib Nephrol. 2011;174:222-231. doi: 10.1159/000329400. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

Abstract

The search for the optimal intensity in renal replacement therapy of the critically ill has resulted in several well-designed randomized controlled trials over the last decade. The findings, however, have been somewhat disappointing. Whereas earlier trials indicated a survival benefit using higher doses ( > 35 ml/kg/h) or daily dialysis, more recent and much larger trials have shown that intensities in the range of 20-25 ml/kg/h or alternate day dialysis may be sufficient. This review attempts to explain these discrepant findings by critically reappraising several issues including the concept of dose, comparability of doses, importance of middle molecule clearance, indication and timing of treatment as well as patient heterogeneity between the published studies.

摘要

在过去十年中,为寻找危重症患者肾脏替代治疗的最佳强度,开展了多项精心设计的随机对照试验。然而,研究结果却有些令人失望。早期试验表明,采用较高剂量(>35毫升/千克/小时)或每日透析可带来生存益处,而最近规模大得多的试验表明,20 - 25毫升/千克/小时的强度或隔日透析可能就足够了。本综述试图通过严格重新评估几个问题来解释这些相互矛盾的研究结果,这些问题包括剂量概念、剂量的可比性、中分子清除的重要性、治疗指征和时机以及已发表研究之间的患者异质性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验