Zeng Yun, Xiong Min, Yu Hualong, He Ning, Wang Zhiyong, Liu Zhigang, Han Heng, Chen Sen
Department of Spine Surgery, Dongfeng General Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan Hubei 442000, PR China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Aug;25(8):946-50.
To evaluate the effectiveness of microplate fixation in open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty (ELP) by comparing with anchor fixation.
Between January 2005 and October 2008, 35 patients with multi-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy were treated. Of them, 15 patients underwent ELP by microplate fixation (microplate group) and 20 patients underwent ELP by anchor fixation (anchor group). In microplate group, there were 10 males and 5 females with the age of (51.2 +/- 11.5) years; the disease duration ranged from 6 to 60 months (mean, 14 months); and the preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was 7.7 +/- 2.5. In anchor group, there were 13 males and 7 females with the age of (50.7 +/- 10.8) years; the disease duration ranged from 3 to 58 months (mean, 17 months); and the preoperative JOA score was 7.8 +/- 2.9. There was no significant difference in the general data, such as gender, age, and JOA score between 2 groups (P > 0.05).
All incisions healed by first intention. Thirty-five cases were followed up 24-68 months (mean, 32 months). The operation time was (113 +/- 24) minutes in anchor group and (111 +/- 27) minutes in microplate group, showing no significant difference (t = 0.231 3, P = 0.818 5). The rate of spinal canal expansion in microplate group (60% +/- 24%) was significantly higher than that in anchor group (40% +/- 18%) (t = 2.820, P = 0.008). The JOA scores of 2 groups at 3 months and 24 months after operation were significantly higher than the preoperative scores (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in JOA score between 2 groups at 3 months after operation (t = 1.620 5, P = 0.114 6), but the JOA score of microplate group was significantly higher than that of anchor group at 24 months after operation (t = 3.454 3, P = 0.001 5). X-ray film, MRI, and CT scan at 3-6 months after operation displayed that door spindle reached bony fusion. There was no occurrence of "re-close of door" in 2 groups. The rate of complication in microplate group (13.3%, 2/15) was significantly lower than that in anchor group (25.0%, 5/20) (chi2 = 7.160 0, P = 0.008 6).
ELP by microplate fixation can achieve the stability quickly after operation, which can help patients to do functional exercises early, and has satisfactory effectiveness and less complications.
通过与锚定固定进行比较,评估微型钢板固定在开门式颈椎扩大成形术(ELP)中的有效性。
2005年1月至2008年10月,治疗35例多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者。其中,15例患者采用微型钢板固定进行ELP(微型钢板组),20例患者采用锚定固定进行ELP(锚定组)。微型钢板组中,男性10例,女性5例,年龄为(51.2±11.5)岁;病程6至60个月(平均14个月);术前日本骨科协会(JOA)评分为7.7±2.5。锚定组中,男性13例,女性7例,年龄为(50.7±10.8)岁;病程3至58个月(平均17个月);术前JOA评分为7.8±2.9。两组间性别、年龄和JOA评分等一般资料无显著差异(P>0.05)。
所有切口均一期愈合。35例患者随访24至68个月(平均32个月)。锚定组手术时间为(113±24)分钟,微型钢板组为(111±27)分钟,差异无统计学意义(t=0.231 3,P=0.818 5)。微型钢板组椎管扩大率(60%±24%)显著高于锚定组(40%±18%)(t=2.820,P=0.008)。两组术后3个月和24个月的JOA评分均显著高于术前评分(P<0.01)。术后3个月两组间JOA评分差异无统计学意义(t=1.620 5,P=0.114 6),但术后24个月微型钢板组JOA评分显著高于锚定组(t=3.454 3,P=0.001 5)。术后3至6个月的X线片、MRI和CT扫描显示门轴达到骨性融合。两组均未发生“门再关闭”情况。微型钢板组并发症发生率(13.3%,2/15)显著低于锚定组(25.0%,5/20)(χ2=7.160 0,P=0.008 6)。
微型钢板固定的ELP术后能快速获得稳定性,有助于患者早期进行功能锻炼,效果满意且并发症较少。