Lin Xiang, Chen Kaiwei, Tang Haijun, Huang Xianying, Wei Changwu, Xiao Zengming
Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University.
Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(49):e13534. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013534.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Anchor screw fixation and mini-plate fixation are widely used in unilateral open-door laminoplasty. There is a great controversy over the preferred fixation method. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes between anchor screw fixation and mini-plate fixation for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).
Related studies that compared the clinical effectiveness of anchor screw fixation and mini-plate fixation in cervical laminoplasty for the treatment of MCSM were acquired by a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, CNKI, VIP, and WANFANG up to March, 2018. Included studies were evaluated according to eligibility criteria. The main end points included: preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, postoperative JOA scores, JOA scores improvement rate, preoperative and postoperative cervical range of motion (ROM), preoperative and postoperative cervical curvature index (CCI), lamina open angle, operation time, blood loss, C5 nerve palsy rate and axial symptoms rate.
Papers in English and Chinese were searched for the initial review, but only 12 articles in Chinese were included in this meta-analysis. All of the selected studies were of high quality as indicated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Among 809 patients, 372 underwent anchor screw fixation and 437 underwent mini-plate fixation. The results of this meta-analysis indicated that no significant difference was found in preoperative JOA score, JOA scores improvement rate, preoperative CCI, preoperative ROM, C5 palsy rate and blood loss. However, compared with mini-plate fixation, anchor screw fixation patients showed higher axial symptoms rate [RR = 1.75, 95% CI (1.31, 2.35), P <.05], lower postoperative JOA scores [SMD = -0.38, 95% CI (-0.62, -0.15), P <.05], lower postoperative CCI [SMD = -0.64, 95% CI (-0.94, -0.33), P <.05], lower postoperative ROM [SMD = -1.11, 95% CI (-2.18, -0.04), P <.05], smaller lamina open angle [SMD = -1.98, 95% CI (-3.71, -0.24), P <.05], shorter operation time [SMD = -0.33, 95% CI (-0.59, -0.07), P <.05].
Compared with anchor screw fixation, mini-plate fixation in cervical laminoplasty appears to achieve better clinical and radiographic outcomes with fewer surgical complications. However, future well-designed, randomized controlled trials are still needed to further confirm our results.
系统评价与荟萃分析。
锚钉固定和微型钢板固定在单开门颈椎板成形术中广泛应用。对于哪种固定方法更优存在很大争议。本研究的目的是评估锚钉固定与微型钢板固定治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病(MCSM)的临床疗效。
通过全面检索截至2018年3月的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、维普和万方数据库,获取比较锚钉固定与微型钢板固定在颈椎板成形术中治疗MCSM临床疗效的相关研究。根据纳入标准对纳入研究进行评估。主要终点指标包括:术前日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、术后JOA评分、JOA评分改善率、术前和术后颈椎活动度(ROM)、术前和术后颈椎曲度指数(CCI)、椎板开门角度、手术时间、出血量、C5神经麻痹发生率和轴性症状发生率。
最初检索了中英文文献进行综述,但本荟萃分析仅纳入了12篇中文文章。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS),所有入选研究质量均较高。在809例患者中,372例行锚钉固定,437例行微型钢板固定。本荟萃分析结果表明,术前JOA评分、JOA评分改善率、术前CCI、术前ROM、C5麻痹发生率和出血量方面未发现显著差异。然而,与微型钢板固定相比,锚钉固定患者的轴性症状发生率更高[相对危险度(RR)=1.75,95%可信区间(CI)(1.31,2.35),P<0.05],术后JOA评分更低[标准化均数差(SMD)=-0.38,95%CI(-0.62,-0.15),P<0.05],术后CCI更低[SMD=-0.64,95%CI(-0.94,-0.33),P<0.05],术后ROM更低[SMD=-1.11,95%CI(-2.18,-0.04),P<0.05],椎板开门角度更小[SMD=-1.98,95%CI(-3.71,-0.24),P<0.05],手术时间更短[SMD=-0.33,95%CI(-0.59,-0.07),P<0.05]。
与锚钉固定相比,颈椎板成形术中微型钢板固定似乎能获得更好的临床和影像学结果,手术并发症更少。然而,仍需要未来设计良好的随机对照试验来进一步证实我们的结果。