Kurtz Arabella, Jeffcote Nikki
Doctoral Clinical Psychology Programme, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011 Oct;21(4):245-58. doi: 10.1002/cbm.796. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
In the theoretical literature, there is growing recognition of the psychological impact on staff of working in challenging healthcare settings. In forensic mental health (FMH) services, powerful transference and counter-transference reactions in staff-patient relationships may emerge and may even play a role in contributing to incidents of malpractice, but there is little empirical research here.
The exploration of the experiences of FMH staff in two contrasting services.
Thirteen in-depth interviews were carried out with staff from a range of clinical disciplines in a mainstream National Health Service (NHS) medium secure unit (MSU), and 12 interviews were undertaken with such staff from a Personality Disorder Unit (PDU) in an MSU. All interview data were analysed independently using the grounded theory method. To synthesise the two separate analyses, a thematic analysis of both data sets was carried out, in which 'thematic units' were defined as significant points of comparison between the analyses of the two sets of interviews.
The combined analysis yielded six main themes under two main headings. Themes under the first heading Experience of the Clinical Task were: 'difficulty in achieving task integration'; 'motivation to build relationships, work through difficulty and bring about change'; and 'minimal sense of risk and anxiety at the centre'. Themes under the second heading Experience of the Organisation were: 'a distant and difficult relationship with outside'; 'preoccupation with staff relationships'; and 'feeling unsafe'. The overarching concept of the combined analysis was encapsulated in the quotation: 'Everything contradicts in your mind'.
Clinical and organisational aspects of work seemed separate in the minds of staff, with the latter reported to be more stressful; staff support came in the form of close relationships with colleagues, who saw themselves as isolated in the context of the wider environment. Promotion of the well-being and effectiveness of FMH staff should therefore take account of clinical, organisational and societal aspects of their situation.
在理论文献中,人们越来越认识到在具有挑战性的医疗环境中工作对员工的心理影响。在法医精神卫生(FMH)服务中,员工与患者关系中可能会出现强烈的移情和反移情反应,甚至可能在医疗事故中起作用,但这方面的实证研究很少。
探索FMH工作人员在两种截然不同的服务中的经历。
对一家主流国民保健服务(NHS)中等安全级病房(MSU)中一系列临床学科的工作人员进行了13次深入访谈,并对另一家MSU中人格障碍病房(PDU)的此类工作人员进行了12次访谈。所有访谈数据均采用扎根理论方法进行独立分析。为了综合这两项单独的分析,对两组数据集进行了主题分析,其中“主题单元”被定义为两组访谈分析之间的重要比较点。
综合分析在两个主要标题下产生了六个主要主题。第一个标题“临床任务体验”下的主题是:“实现任务整合困难”;“建立关系、克服困难并带来改变的动力”;以及“中心地带风险和焦虑感最低”。第二个标题“组织体验”下的主题是:“与外部关系疏远且困难”;“专注于员工关系”;以及“感到不安全”。综合分析的总体概念体现在这句话中:“你的脑海中一切都相互矛盾”。
在员工心目中,工作的临床和组织方面似乎是分开的,后者据报道压力更大;员工支持来自与同事的密切关系,他们认为自己在更广泛的环境中是孤立的。因此,促进FMH工作人员的福祉和效率应考虑到他们情况的临床、组织和社会方面。