• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究参与者想了解的关于基因研究结果的内容:“基因例外论”的影响。

What research participants want to know about genetic research results: the impact of "genetic exceptionalism".

作者信息

Ruiz-Canela Miguel, Valle-Mansilla J Ignacio, Sulmasy Daniel P

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Humanities, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Sep;6(3):39-46. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.39.

DOI:10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.39
PMID:21931236
Abstract

The disclosure of individual genetic results has generated an ongoing debate about which rules should be followed. We aimed to identify factors related to research participants' preferences about learning the results of genomic studies using their donated tissue samples. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 279 patients from the United States and Spain who had volunteered to donate a sample for genomic research. Our results show that 48% of research participants would like to be informed about all individual results from future genomic studies using their donated tissue, especially those from the U.S. (71.4%) and those believing that genetic information poses special risks (69.7%). In addition, 16% of research participants considered genetic information to be riskier than other types of personal medical data. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that a high proportion of participants prefer to be informed about their individual results and that there is a higher preference among those research subjects who perceive their genetic information as riskier than other types of personal medical data.

摘要

个人基因检测结果的披露引发了一场关于应遵循何种规则的持续辩论。我们旨在确定与研究参与者对于了解使用其捐赠组织样本进行的基因组研究结果的偏好相关的因素。我们对来自美国和西班牙的279名自愿捐赠样本用于基因组研究的患者进行了横断面调查。我们的结果显示,48%的研究参与者希望被告知未来使用其捐赠组织进行的所有基因组研究的个人结果,尤其是来自美国的参与者(71.4%)以及那些认为基因信息存在特殊风险的参与者(69.7%)。此外,16%的研究参与者认为基因信息比其他类型的个人医疗数据风险更高。总之,我们的研究表明,很大一部分参与者希望被告知他们的个人结果,并且在那些认为其基因信息比其他类型的个人医疗数据风险更高的研究对象中,这种偏好更为强烈。

相似文献

1
What research participants want to know about genetic research results: the impact of "genetic exceptionalism".研究参与者想了解的关于基因研究结果的内容:“基因例外论”的影响。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Sep;6(3):39-46. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.39.
2
Genomic research with human samples. Points of view from scientists and research subjects about disclosure of results and risks of genomic research. Ethical and empirical approach.使用人类样本的基因组研究。科学家和研究对象对基因组研究结果披露及风险的观点。伦理与实证方法。
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2011 Jan-Jun(34):205-24.
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
4
Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research.捐赠生物样本的女性乳腺癌患者对样本用于基因研究的存储和使用的看法。
Clin Genet. 2006 May;69(5):393-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00614.x.
5
Patients' attitudes to informed consent for genomic research with donated samples.患者对捐赠样本进行基因组研究的知情同意态度。
Cancer Invest. 2010 Aug;28(7):726-34. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2010.494320.
6
Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think?基因研究与向生物样本库捐赠组织样本。瑞典普通公众中的潜在样本捐赠者是怎么想的?
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Aug;16(4):433-40. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki198. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
7
Researchers' preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain.研究人员对基因组学研究伦理方面的偏好和态度:美国与西班牙的比较研究。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr;35(4):251-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.025957.
8
Ethical issues associated with conducting genetic family studies of complex disease.与开展复杂疾病的基因家族研究相关的伦理问题。
Ann Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;15(9):712-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.09.010.
9
Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy.向研究参与者反馈个体基因结果:支持有条件的披露政策。
Hum Mutat. 2011 Aug;32(8):861-7. doi: 10.1002/humu.21518. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
10
Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research.儿童参与基因研究引发的伦理问题。
J Pediatr. 2006 Jul;149(1 Suppl):S34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.049.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of participants with undiagnosed diseases and hereditary cancers during the initial phase of the Hong Kong genome project: a mixed-methods study.香港基因组计划初始阶段未确诊疾病和遗传性癌症参与者的经历:一项混合方法研究
Hum Genomics. 2025 Apr 5;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00746-5.
2
Research biobank participants attitudes towards genetic exceptionalism and health record confidentiality.生物样本库研究参与者对基因例外论和健康记录保密性的态度。
J Community Genet. 2024 Jun;15(3):267-280. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00704-z. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
3
Patients' and Members of the Public's Wishes Regarding Transparency in the Context of Secondary Use of Health Data: Scoping Review.
患者和公众对健康数据二次使用背景下透明度的期望:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 13;25:e45002. doi: 10.2196/45002.
4
REFUTING THE RIGHT NOT TO KNOW.驳斥不知情权
J Health Care Law Policy. 2017;19(1):1-72. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
5
Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.基因组研究中个体研究结果的返还:利益相关者观点的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0258646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646. eCollection 2021.
6
Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review.关于基因组研究结果传递方法和知情同意的观点:综述。
Per Med. 2021 May;18(3):295-310. doi: 10.2217/pme-2020-0139. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
7
Preferences for Accessing Electronic Health Records for Research Purposes: Views of Parents Who Have a Child With a Known or Suspected Genetic Condition.出于研究目的访问电子健康记录的偏好:有已知或疑似遗传疾病儿童的家长的观点。
Value Health. 2020 Dec;23(12):1639-1652. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
8
Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Related to the Inclusion of Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities in Electronic Health Record Research: Scoping Review.与将智障人士纳入电子健康记录研究相关的伦理、法律和社会问题:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 21;22(5):e16734. doi: 10.2196/16734.
9
Preferences for the research use of electronic health records among young adults with fragile X syndrome or autism spectrum disorder.脆性 X 综合征或自闭症谱系障碍的年轻成年人对电子健康记录研究使用的偏好。
Disabil Health J. 2020 Oct;13(4):100927. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100927. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
10
Reconceptualizing harms and benefits in the genomic age.重新认识基因组时代的危害与益处。
Per Med. 2018 Sep;15(5):419-428. doi: 10.2217/pme-2018-0022. Epub 2018 Sep 27.