Raspa Melissa, Moultrie Rebecca, Wagner Laura, Edwards Anne, Andrews Sara, Frisch Mary Katherine, Turner-Brown Lauren, Wheeler Anne
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, TEACCH Autism Program, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 21;22(5):e16734. doi: 10.2196/16734.
Data from electronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly used in the field of genetic research to further precision medicine initiatives. However, many of these efforts exclude individuals with intellectual disabilities, which often stem from genetic conditions. To include this important subpopulation in EHR research, important ethical, legal, and social issues should be considered.
The goal of this study was to review prior research to better understand what ethical, legal, and social issues may need further investigation when considering the research use of EHRs for individuals with genetic conditions that may result in intellectual disability. This information will be valuable in developing methods and best practices for involving this group in research given they are considered a vulnerable population that may need special research protections.
We conducted a scoping review to examine issues related to the use of EHRs for research purposes and those more broadly associated with genetic research. The initial search yielded a total of 460 unique citations. We used an evaluative coding process to determine relevancy for inclusion.
This approach resulted in 59 articles in the following areas: informed consent, privacy and security, return of results, and vulnerable populations. The review included several models of garnering informed consent in EHR or genetic research, including tiered or categorical, blanket or general, open, and opt-out models. Second, studies reported on patients' concerns regarding the privacy and security of EHR or genetic data, such as who has access, type of data use in research, identifiability, and risks associated with privacy breach. The literature on return of research results using biospecimens examined the dissension in the field, particularly when sharing individualized genetic results. Finally, work involving vulnerable populations highlighted special considerations when conducting EHR or genetic research.
The results frame important questions for researchers to consider when designing EHR studies, which include individuals with intellectual disabilities, including appropriate safeguards and protections.
电子健康记录(EHR)中的数据在基因研究领域越来越多地被用于推进精准医疗计划。然而,这些努力大多将智障人士排除在外,而智障往往源于遗传疾病。为了将这一重要亚群体纳入电子健康记录研究,应考虑重要的伦理、法律和社会问题。
本研究的目的是回顾先前的研究,以更好地了解在考虑将电子健康记录用于可能导致智障的遗传疾病患者的研究时,哪些伦理、法律和社会问题可能需要进一步调查。鉴于这一群体被视为可能需要特殊研究保护的弱势群体,这些信息对于制定让该群体参与研究的方法和最佳实践将具有重要价值。
我们进行了一项范围审查,以检查与将电子健康记录用于研究目的相关的问题以及那些更广泛地与基因研究相关的问题。初步搜索共产生了460条独特的引文。我们使用了一个评估编码过程来确定纳入的相关性。
这种方法产生了59篇关于以下领域的文章:知情同意、隐私与安全、结果反馈以及弱势群体。该综述包括电子健康记录或基因研究中获取知情同意的几种模式,包括分层或分类、全面或一般、开放和退出模式。其次,研究报告了患者对电子健康记录或基因数据隐私与安全的担忧,例如谁有权访问、研究中数据使用的类型、可识别性以及与隐私泄露相关的风险。关于使用生物样本反馈研究结果的文献探讨了该领域的分歧,特别是在分享个性化基因结果时。最后,涉及弱势群体的研究强调了在进行电子健康记录或基因研究时的特殊考虑因素。
研究结果为研究人员在设计包括智障人士的电子健康记录研究时应考虑的重要问题提供了框架,包括适当的保障措施和保护。