INSERM U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Epidemiology of Occupational and Social Determinants of Health, Villejuif, France.
Mol Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;18(1):112-21. doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.116. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
Individuals with low socioeconomic position have high rates of depression; however, it is not clear whether this reflects higher incidence or longer persistence of disorder. Past research focused on high-risk samples, and risk factors of long-term depression in the population are less well known. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that socioeconomic position predicts depression trajectory over 13 years of follow-up in a community sample. We studied 12 650 individuals participating in the French GAZEL study. Depression was assessed by the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale in 1996, 1999, 2002, 2005 and 2008. These five assessments served to estimate longitudinal depression trajectories (no depression, decreasing depression, intermediate/increasing depression, persistent depression). Socioeconomic position was measured by occupational grade. Covariates included year of birth, marital status, tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, negative life events and preexisting psychological and non-psychological health problems. Data were analyzed using multinomial regression, separately in men and women. Overall, participants in intermediate and low occupational grades were significantly more likely than those in high grades to have an unfavorable depression trajectory and to experience persistent depression (age-adjusted ORs: respectively 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.70 and 2.65, 95% CI 2.04-3.45 in men, 2.48, 95% CI 1.36-4.54 and 4.53, 95% CI 2.38-8.63 in women). In multivariate models, the socioeconomic gradient in long-term depression decreased by 21-59% in men and women. Long-term depression trajectories appear to follow a socioeconomic gradient; therefore, efforts aiming to reduce the burden of depression should address the needs of the whole population rather than exclusively focus on high-risk groups.
社会经济地位较低的个体抑郁发生率较高;然而,目前尚不清楚这是反映了更高的发病率还是更长的疾病持续时间。过去的研究主要集中在高危人群,人群中与长期抑郁相关的风险因素知之甚少。我们的目的是检验这样一个假设,即在一个社区样本中,社会经济地位可预测 13 年随访期间的抑郁轨迹。我们研究了参加法国 GAZEL 研究的 12650 名个体。1996 年、1999 年、2002 年、2005 年和 2008 年,采用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表评估抑郁情况。这五次评估用于估计纵向抑郁轨迹(无抑郁、抑郁减少、中间/增加抑郁、持续抑郁)。社会经济地位通过职业等级来衡量。协变量包括出生年份、婚姻状况、吸烟、饮酒、体重指数、负性生活事件以及先前存在的心理和非心理健康问题。分别在男性和女性中使用多项回归分析数据。总体而言,处于中间和低职业等级的参与者比处于高职业等级的参与者更有可能出现不良的抑郁轨迹,并经历持续性抑郁(年龄调整后的 OR:男性分别为 1.40,95%置信区间(CI)为 1.16-1.70 和 2.65,95%CI 为 2.04-3.45,女性为 2.48,95%CI 为 1.36-4.54 和 4.53,95%CI 为 2.38-8.63)。在多变量模型中,男性和女性的长期抑郁社会经济梯度分别降低了 21%-59%。长期抑郁轨迹似乎遵循社会经济梯度;因此,旨在减轻抑郁负担的努力应该满足整个人群的需求,而不仅仅是专门针对高危人群。