Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024459. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
We compared the readmission rates and the pattern of readmission among patients discharged against medical advice (AMA) to control patients discharged with approval over a one-year follow-up period.
A retrospective matched-cohort study of 656 patients(328 were discharged AMA) who were followed for one year after their initial hospitalization at an urban university-affiliated teaching hospital in Vancouver, Canada that serves a population with high prevalence of addiction and psychiatric disorders. Multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to examine the independent association of discharge AMA on 14-day related diagnosis hospital readmission. We fit a multivariate conditional negative binomial regression model to examine the readmission frequency ratio between the AMA and non-AMA group.
AMA patients were more likely to be homeless (32.3% vs. 11%) and have co-morbid conditions such as psychiatric illnesses, injection drug use, HIV, hepatitis C and previous gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients discharged AMA were more likely to be readmitted: 25.6% vs. 3.4%, p<0.001 by day 14. The AMA group were more likely to be readmitted within 14 days with a related diagnosis than the non-AMA group (Adjusted Odds Ratio 12.0; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 3.7-38.9). Patients who left AMA were more likely to be readmitted multiple times at one year compared to the non-AMA group (adjusted frequency ratio 1.6; 95% CI: 1.3-2.0). There was also higher all-cause in-hospital mortality during the 12-month follow-up in the AMA group compared to non-AMA group (6.7% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.01).
Patients discharged AMA were more likely to be homeless and have multiple co-morbid conditions. At one year follow-up, the AMA group had higher readmission rates, were predisposed to multiple readmissions and had a higher in-hospital mortality. Interventions to reduce discharges AMA in high-risk groups need to be developed and tested.
我们比较了在一年随访期间,因拒绝医疗建议(AMA)出院的患者与经批准出院的对照患者的再入院率和再入院模式。
这是一项回顾性匹配队列研究,共纳入 656 名患者(328 名因 AMA 出院),他们在加拿大温哥华的一所城市大学附属医院首次住院后随访一年,该医院服务的人群中存在较高的成瘾和精神疾病患病率。多变量条件逻辑回归用于检验 AMA 出院与 14 天相关诊断再入院之间的独立关联。我们拟合了一个多变量条件负二项回归模型,以检验 AMA 组和非 AMA 组的再入院频率比。
AMA 患者更有可能无家可归(32.3% vs. 11%),并且合并多种疾病,如精神疾病、注射毒品使用、HIV、丙型肝炎和既往胃肠道出血。出院 AMA 的患者在 14 天内再入院的可能性更高:25.6% vs. 3.4%,p<0.001。与非 AMA 组相比,AMA 组在 14 天内因相关诊断而再次入院的可能性更高(调整后的优势比 12.0;95%置信区间 [CI]:3.7-38.9)。与非 AMA 组相比,离开 AMA 的患者在一年内更有可能多次入院(调整后的频率比 1.6;95% CI:1.3-2.0)。在 12 个月的随访期间,AMA 组的全因院内死亡率也高于非 AMA 组(6.7% vs. 2.4%,p=0.01)。
出院 AMA 的患者更有可能无家可归,且合并多种共病。在一年的随访中,AMA 组的再入院率更高,更倾向于多次再入院,且院内死亡率更高。需要制定和测试减少高危人群 AMA 出院的干预措施。