Freyberger H J, Dittmann V, Stieglitz R D, Dilling H
Klinik für Psychiatrie, Medizinischen Universität Lübeck.
Nervenarzt. 1990 May;61(5):271-5.
134 clinicians in 10 centres participated in the WHO-initiated field trial in German-speaking countries of the provisional form of ICD-10, chapter V, clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. 1778 diagnostic assessments were given for 90 cases. In general, the results show a comparatively high degree of acceptance of the new classification. Interrater-reliability coefficients are satisfactory. A high concordance of diagnostic categories between ICD-9, ICD-10 and DSM-III was found.
来自10个中心的134名临床医生参与了世界卫生组织在德语国家发起的关于ICD - 10第五章临时版本(临床描述和诊断指南)的现场试验。针对90个病例进行了1778次诊断评估。总体而言,结果显示对新分类的接受程度相对较高。评定者间信度系数令人满意。发现ICD - 9、ICD - 10和DSM - III之间诊断类别具有高度一致性。