Respiratory System Diagnostics and Bronchoscopy Department, Medical University of Białystok, Poland.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Nov;27(11):2223-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.620950. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
Long-term oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy and related adverse events are associated with a significant burden on patients and healthcare resources.
This subgroup analysis of a randomized, open-label, parallel-group study evaluated the OCS-sparing effect of omalizumab (OMA) added to optimized asthma therapy (OAT), compared with OAT alone. Patients (12-75 years) with severe allergic asthma, uncontrolled despite GINA 2004 Step 4 therapy, received OMA or OAT for 32 weeks. The change from baseline in OCS use by Week 32 in patients requiring maintenance OCS at baseline was assessed in terms of percent OCS dose change and numbers of patients with reduced/stopped or maintained/increased OCS.
Eighty-two patients were receiving maintenance OCS at baseline (OMA/OAT n = 59, OAT n = 23). Change from baseline in mean maintenance OCS dose at Week 32 was significantly greater in the OMA/OAT group compared with the OAT group (-45% vs. + 18.3%, p = 0.002). In the OMA/OAT group, 37 patients (62.7%) reduced/stopped OCS use at Week 32, compared with seven patients (30.4%) receiving OAT (p = 0.013). Improvements in other efficacy outcomes were seen at Week 32 in the OMA/OAT group, irrespective of OCS use. An investigator global evaluation of treatment effectiveness at Week 16 was an effective predictor of persistent treatment response at 32 weeks for the majority of OMA/OAT patients (93%), also irrespective of OCS use.
In this open-label study of patients with severe allergic asthma, OMA/OAT therapy reduced maintenance OCS use, compared with OAT alone. Improvements in efficacy measures were observed in the OMA/OAT group, irrespective of OCS change. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00264849.
长期口服皮质类固醇(OCS)治疗及其相关不良反应给患者和医疗资源带来了巨大负担。
本项随机、开放标签、平行组研究的亚组分析评估了奥马珠单抗(OMA)联合优化哮喘治疗(OAT)与单独 OAT 相比对 OCS 的节省作用。患有重度过敏性哮喘的患者(12-75 岁)尽管接受 GINA 2004 第 4 步治疗但仍未得到控制,他们接受 OMA 或 OAT 治疗 32 周。在基线时需要维持 OCS 的患者中,从基线到第 32 周 OCS 使用量的变化情况通过 OCS 剂量变化的百分比和减少/停用或维持/增加 OCS 的患者数量来评估。
82 名患者在基线时正在接受维持 OCS 治疗(OMA/OAT n=59,OAT n=23)。与 OAT 组相比,OMA/OAT 组在第 32 周时的平均维持 OCS 剂量的变化从基线显著更大(-45%对+18.3%,p=0.002)。在 OMA/OAT 组中,有 37 名患者(62.7%)在第 32 周时减少/停用 OCS,而接受 OAT 治疗的患者有 7 名(30.4%)(p=0.013)。在 OMA/OAT 组中,无论 OCS 的使用情况如何,在第 32 周时观察到其他疗效终点的改善。在第 16 周时,研究者对治疗有效性的全球评估是大多数 OMA/OAT 患者(93%)在第 32 周时持续治疗反应的有效预测指标,也与 OCS 的使用无关。
在这项对重度过敏性哮喘患者的开放标签研究中,与单独 OAT 治疗相比,OMA/OAT 治疗减少了维持 OCS 的使用。在 OMA/OAT 组中观察到疗效指标的改善,而与 OCS 的变化无关。
NCT00264849。